Is M1 0W40 Still the King of Euro?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw

I said numerous times before that M1 0W40 is good oil. King is definitely not!


In your OPINION.

Originally Posted By: edyvw
Meets a lot of specs? So does Castrol 0W40, Pentosin 5W40, Motul X-Cess 5W40 etc, etc.


The Castrol product meets basically all the same specs and is almost as equally available. That's why I've mentioned it in the thread several times already. However, the other two products are not the same grade and are subsequently irrelevant.

Originally Posted By: edyvw
Cold cranking? While I understand numbers, I also understand what my engine is telling me at -20 degrees. With Castrol 0W30 or 0W40 I always have nice smooth start. M1 0W40 always reminds me that car has a thing called: camshafts. Never noticed difference between M1 0W40 and Pentosin 5W40 when it comes to cold start. But noticed huge difference between those oils and Castrol 0W30 and 0W40 in very cold temperatures.


I really don't think you do. I've used Mobil 1 0w-40 in my M5 (and it had twice the number of cams) when it was -30C, that's the CCS limit for the 5w-xx designation, let that sink in for a second. The CCS (cold cranking simulator) limit for a 0w-xx oil is -35C and you are telling me you notice a difference at -20C, 15C ABOVE where the oil is tested? Come on, even Stevie Wonder could see that elephant in the room.

Originally Posted By: edyvw
Sound n higher rpms? Yes, with M1 is there.


Anecdote. I had no sound, in a 400HP car with 11:1 compression, with it, PU 5w-40, or the OEM BMW 5w30. Sound means nothing unless somebody has specifically solicited your opinion on that matter, which they haven't. This thread is a general discussion.

Originally Posted By: edyvw
So, is it scientific? No.


You've got that right.

Originally Posted By: edyvw
But I am one of those people that like to listen what engine has to say.


Seriously? The oil that is good enough for Mercedes and Porsche in the 24hrs of LeMans isn't good enough for your car? What does your engine "say" about that?

Originally Posted By: edyvw
Is M1 bad oil? Absolutely not. If I did not have option to get Castrol 0W40, would I use M1 0W40? Absolutely!
But IMHO, Castrol 0W40 in better suited for my car and my needs (starting car on -20.-30 at 12,000ft).


Both are equally suited because they have the same bloody approvals, the difference is that Mobil actually provides their MRV numbers, Castrol doesn't. But both are required to be within the limits.

Basically, personally you PREFER Castrol, and that's fine. I PREFER Mobil. They are both excellent products and equally capable. Generally, the Mobil product can be had cheaper and is more available. It has BETTER availability. I consider both products interchangeable and while my preference is Mobil, I make no claims about the Castrol product being inferior in any way.

Well, considering you have double number of camshafts, I suppose to figure you are better equipped to tell the difference.
I already told you, Castrol 0W40 (or 0W30) suits my needs better. But, apparently having 4 camshafts and 11:1 compression ratio makes you better informed.
When it comes to cold cranking capability, again, I would say that even Mobil1 5W30 ESP I used behave better. Why? Maybe Castrol and ESP have more Ester that sticks to the moving parts and they stay longer there, IDK< nor I care, I know it works better in cold then M1.
I get your point, but again, i trust my ears more then Mobil1 (not that I trust them at all in the end, it is again EXOM, or for that matter BP).
Again, it is good oil, I used it a lot, but not king of the hill.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Well, considering you have double number of camshafts, I suppose to figure you are better equipped to tell the difference.


Well, it is twice the equipment to make noise
wink.gif


Originally Posted By: edyvw
I already told you, Castrol 0W40 (or 0W30) suits my needs better. But, apparently having 4 camshafts and 11:1 compression ratio makes you better informed.


In terms of the ability to test the cold temp characteristics of the oil, an engine with high compression, 8 cylinders and 4 cams is going to be harder to start and has a higher potential for noise.

I don't believe the Castrol products are "better suited" any more than any other oil with the same specs of the same grade. I believe you are seeing the personification of some personal bias (IMHO).

Originally Posted By: edyvw
When it comes to cold cranking capability, again, I would say that even Mobil1 5W30 ESP I used behave better. Why? Maybe Castrol and ESP have more Ester that sticks to the moving parts and they stay longer there, IDK< nor I care, I know it works better in cold then M1.


This is all based on what you "feel" though. I may "feel" that Unicorns and rainbows are the bestest ever but ultimately without some facts, that's all it is, personal opinion
smile.gif
Ultimately, the 0w-xx oils have better cold temperature performance regardless of our feelings
grin.gif


Originally Posted By: edyvw
I get your point, but again, i trust my ears more then Mobil1 (not that I trust them at all in the end, it is again EXOM, or for that matter BP).
Again, it is good oil, I used it a lot, but not king of the hill.


But I don't trust your ears more than Mobil, LOL!
wink.gif
And it being king of the hill (or not) is, in this instance, an opinion based on a myriad of factors. We disagree on this, and that's fine. However my position is based more on the hard facts of price, certifications and availability rather than feelings. I respect that you have an issue with the product but that really doesn't help further the purpose of this thread.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Well, considering you have double number of camshafts, I suppose to figure you are better equipped to tell the difference.


Well, it is twice the equipment to make noise
wink.gif


Originally Posted By: edyvw
I already told you, Castrol 0W40 (or 0W30) suits my needs better. But, apparently having 4 camshafts and 11:1 compression ratio makes you better informed.


In terms of the ability to test the cold temp characteristics of the oil, an engine with high compression, 8 cylinders and 4 cams is going to be harder to start and has a higher potential for noise.

I don't believe the Castrol products are "better suited" any more than any other oil with the same specs of the same grade. I believe you are seeing the personification of some personal bias (IMHO).

Originally Posted By: edyvw
When it comes to cold cranking capability, again, I would say that even Mobil1 5W30 ESP I used behave better. Why? Maybe Castrol and ESP have more Ester that sticks to the moving parts and they stay longer there, IDK< nor I care, I know it works better in cold then M1.


This is all based on what you "feel" though. I may "feel" that Unicorns and rainbows are the bestest ever but ultimately without some facts, that's all it is, personal opinion
smile.gif
Ultimately, the 0w-xx oils have better cold temperature performance regardless of our feelings
grin.gif


Originally Posted By: edyvw
I get your point, but again, i trust my ears more then Mobil1 (not that I trust them at all in the end, it is again EXOM, or for that matter BP).
Again, it is good oil, I used it a lot, but not king of the hill.


But I don't trust your ears more than Mobil, LOL!
wink.gif
And it being king of the hill (or not) is, in this instance, an opinion based on a myriad of factors. We disagree on this, and that's fine. However my position is based more on the hard facts of price, certifications and availability rather than feelings. I respect that you have an issue with the product but that really doesn't help further the purpose of this thread.

When it comes to certification, what certification M1 meets that Castrol 0W40 does not?
 
Just switched out my shell helix ultra 5w40 at nearly 11000km. In went mobil 1 0w40 batch 21st may 2014 bought on sale. Initial impression.. noise levels same as shell helix ultra. Oil pressure seems to be about 1 or 2psi more than helix ultra. Could be the oil is brand new and the 100c cst is 13.5 opposed to shells 13.1.
Funny thing is the mechanic who saw the mobil 1 asked me if its ok to pour in a 0w oil that is too "thin" in his opinion...lol..
 
Just too be fair, Castrol 0W40 has just recently became cheaper than M1 0W40, it has always been $2~3 dollar more than M1 for the 5qt jug at WM.

I even see 5W30EP mentioned, which is not an Euro formula...Motul and Pentosin? I'm not spending more money on "exotic" oil brands that don't offer more.
 
Originally Posted By: alcyon
Funny thing is the mechanic who saw the mobil 1 asked me if its ok to pour in a 0w oil that is too "thin" in his opinion...lol..

I've heard that rubbish, too; notably, 0w-40 was "too thin" for my Audi when an ILSAC 10w30 was okay.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw

When it comes to certification, what certification M1 meets that Castrol 0W40 does not?


Nissan GT-R, that's about it I think.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw

When it comes to certification, what certification M1 meets that Castrol 0W40 does not?


Nissan GT-R, that's about it I think.

And that is important why? What that "specification" means? As far as I know, M1 0W40 is THE ONLY oil that has that "specification."
Nissan GT-R "spec" is same as Pennzoil's (Shell's) Ferrari advertisement.
It is an "advertisement specification."
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Leonardo629
Just too be fair, Castrol 0W40 has just recently became cheaper than M1 0W40, it has always been $2~3 dollar more than M1 for the 5qt jug at WM.

I even see 5W30EP mentioned, which is not an Euro formula...Motul and Pentosin? I'm not spending more money on "exotic" oil brands that don't offer more.


If you are referring to my post, I mentioned M1 5W30 ESP NOT EP. 5W30 ESP is Low-SAPS ACEA C3 oil.
 
M1 0W40 can handle 903hp without breaking down mid-race? Freakin' impressive!

Can we be certain this 0W40 is not some one-off miracle infused with the morning breaths of unicorns?
 
Originally Posted By: Leonardo629
M1 0W40 can handle 903hp without breaking down mid-race? Freakin' impressive!

Can we be certain this 0W40 is not some one-off miracle infused with the morning breaths of unicorns?


Just think about those poor VII's. Get a 25w40 in there quick!
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw

When it comes to certification, what certification M1 meets that Castrol 0W40 does not?


Nissan GT-R, that's about it I think.

And that is important why? What that "specification" means? As far as I know, M1 0W40 is THE ONLY oil that has that "specification."
Nissan GT-R "spec" is same as Pennzoil's (Shell's) Ferrari advertisement.
It is an "advertisement specification."
smile.gif



Never said it was important bud, you asked, I gave you an answer
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw

When it comes to certification, what certification M1 meets that Castrol 0W40 does not?


Nissan GT-R, that's about it I think.

And that is important why? What that "specification" means? As far as I know, M1 0W40 is THE ONLY oil that has that "specification."
Nissan GT-R "spec" is same as Pennzoil's (Shell's) Ferrari advertisement.
It is an "advertisement specification."
smile.gif



Never said it was important bud, you asked, I gave you an answer
wink.gif


Well, you implied that M1 has more certifications, which is not true.
If GT-R is "specification" then, how about Shell/Pennzoil? They are approved by Ferrari? Agip that comes in Lamborghini? hmmm, Nissan or Ferrari?
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Well, you implied that M1 has more certifications, which is not true.
If GT-R is "specification" then, how about Shell/Pennzoil? They are approved by Ferrari? Agip that comes in Lamborghini? hmmm, Nissan or Ferrari?


Actually, yes, when this was discussed before the Ferrari thing came up which "equalled out" PU 5w-40 and M1 0w-40 when their certification lists were being compared as otherwise the lists were identical.

But really, it isn't important. M1 0w-40 and GC 0w-40 have basically all the same certs/approvals. Historically the M1 0w-40 product has been easier to get on sale (and the Castrol one hasn't been around all that long either) and had better availability. Perhaps that will change in the future, but those were the primary benefits the one had over the other. Otherwise, they are interchangeable.

The only other thing I can think of is that M1 0w-40 is used by a myriad of factory race teams, whilst I've never seen the same mentioned for the Castrol 0w-40
21.gif
But again, it is a much newer product.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Well, you implied that M1 has more certifications, which is not true.
If GT-R is "specification" then, how about Shell/Pennzoil? They are approved by Ferrari? Agip that comes in Lamborghini? hmmm, Nissan or Ferrari?


Actually, yes, when this was discussed before the Ferrari thing came up which "equalled out" PU 5w-40 and M1 0w-40 when their certification lists were being compared as otherwise the lists were identical.

But really, it isn't important. M1 0w-40 and GC 0w-40 have basically all the same certs/approvals. Historically the M1 0w-40 product has been easier to get on sale (and the Castrol one hasn't been around all that long either) and had better availability. Perhaps that will change in the future, but those were the primary benefits the one had over the other. Otherwise, they are interchangeable.

The only other thing I can think of is that M1 0w-40 is used by a myriad of factory race teams, whilst I've never seen the same mentioned for the Castrol 0w-40
21.gif
But again, it is a much newer product.

Much newer product where? NA?
Castrol 0W40 is present on the EU market for a long, long time, since 0W40 oils started to show up, as well in racing.
Fact is that NA market does not have a lot of other excellent oils that EU market has.
So yes, Castrol 0W40 (GC) is newer on NA market. In reality not new at all.
 
how can you guys still be arguing after leanrning M1 0W40 is the factory fill for P1? 40wt oil in a 900hp car (well..the 3.8 tubro V8 puts out some 730hp I think) is crazy....Wouldn't 40wt be too thin at that kind of power level?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Leonardo629
how can you guys still be arguing after leanrning M1 0W40 is the factory fill for P1? 40wt oil in a 900hp car (well..the 3.8 tubro V8 puts out some 730hp I think) is crazy....Wouldn't 40wt be too thin at that kind of power level?


All depends on temps. Actually the M1 mentioned is a bit thin for a 40.

You have to know how the temps are controlled. If kept well in check then the M1 0w-40 is fine...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom