I didn't know this was even up for discussion. Why would I stick to the carmaker's minimum HTHS requirement if I thought I could reap the benefits of lower viscosity without wear and service life penalty? If the car maker suggests a different HTHS for different markets my choice is clear to me.But would you think there would still be the same level of engine protection if you ran a 0W-20 with a HTHS of 2.5 cP in that engine? That's what I'm asking. Why do you think your OM calls out oils with 3.5 HTSH or more? Could it be that the engineers know it's going to give more engine protection (and care less about CAFE) than an oil with HTHS of 2.5 cP? I'd say the answer is yes.
Last edited: