She has (2) options: "Instant" transfer and Venmo takes a couple % of the money or ACH transfer which takes "1-3 days" and is free. 100% free. I use option # 2 every time with Venmo.My daughter told me that there would be no fees if she transferred the money to her bank account and let it sit for a few days. I don't know the rules, but I do know that most every other cash transfer means there is a fee.
She has (2) options: "Instant" transfer and Venmo takes a couple % of the money or ACH transfer which takes "1-3 days" and is free. 100% free. I use option # 2 every time with Venmo.
You wouldn't like the SIG Forum . The site owner will body slam you in a heartbeat if he doesn't agree with your position . His site , his rules . No middle ground .I think it should be forum policy that moderators confine their comments to BITOG's core subjects. In other words I don't think moderators should participate in "thought-provoking" threads such as this one.
Scott
Yes, I agree, but that wasn't my point. The OP posted a question regarding whether it was a right or not. People were willing to politely discuss that concept. Whether it matters or not or people are being de-banked or not - I don't know. Lots of things are discussed around here that don't matter a whole lot.Agree, but accused means nothing and discrimination exists in all walks of life.
Breaking the law exists in all walks of life, but that is the minority as the article shows one bank was accused out of what, hundreds ?
Or is it thousands?
I don’t know, but either way, then they are open to a lawsuit because discrimination is against the law.
I would say, as far as a "human right" no.I can't have a job without an account to deposit my pay into.
I can't do my tax (or child support) without a bank account.
Can't buy a house, car etc....
Can't hold stocks or bonds..
So with the inability to exist without one ?
Should access to a bank account in Western society beva human right ?
Thanks for all the responses, particularly those that have read the original post.
Nope, I'm not bankless, nor destitute, and have recently made a millionaire out of someone that bore the children that I used to have...even that is impossible without bank accounts.
Fraudulent activity this week on one account meant switching to another...and re-establishing my financial structure when that gets sorted.
Point is that in Oz, you CANNOT interact with an employer, govt agency etc. without banking accounts....thus the question regarding if the fact that youcannot transact a "normal" life without such.
And yes, my provoking thought was my own difficulties with locked accounts (which is no huge impost)...along with Nigel Farrage, who has had ALL his accounts closed, and all banks deny him access...in an economy where one cannot function without one.
That has not been my experience with you.Whatever.
I'm not the one that would be locking a thread because someone's feelings got hurt.... I'm a big boy and I can handle adult discussions about adult subjects... I am grown enough to be able to scroll on by, engage or ignore.
Agree, accused means nothing and discrimination exists in all walks of life.
Breaking the law exists in all walks of life, but that is the minority as the article shows one bank was accused out of what, hundreds ?
Or is it thousands?
I don’t know, but either way, then they are open to a lawsuit
Yeah I don’t disagree but it’s a tricky question being the OP lives in a different country with different protections and culture.Yes, I agree, but that wasn't my point. The OP posted a question regarding whether it was a right or not. People were willing to politely discuss that concept. Whether it matters or not or people are being de-banked or not - I don't know. Lots of things are discussed around here that don't matter a whole lot.
I discuss the weather with my neighbor. Neither of us can change it, but we still do.
Happened to a non-profit up here recently. A group that had vocally resisted wind turbines in their area, and had founded this non-profit ages ago during the GEA days to educate and inform on the wind industry and its activities in Ontario recently had their bank account inexplicably closed after that same bank had one of their executives become affiliated with (Chair of the board) an Environmental charity organization founded by one of the architects of the GEA.People have been "de-banked" in the US depending on their personal and organizations political leanings. Happened with Chase IIRC, this made it into the news, and the account was reinstated. Activism is increasing in the financial sector especially in Europe, people ARE being de-banked based on opinions.
Is there a right to have a bank account? It's not in the Bill of Rights, it's not a law, but there are many people out there that probably shouldn't (fraudsters) and they still do. Unless you're trying to have investments at the Renaissance Fund (5MM minimum entry) then you shouldn't have a hard time at your local bank or FCU.
An interesting point.I can't have a job without an account to deposit my pay into.
I can't do my tax (or child support) without a bank account.
Can't buy a house, car etc....
Can't hold stocks or bonds..
So with the inability to exist without one ?
Should access to a bank account in Western society beva human right ?
Just how many years should one be a BITOG member prior to opening a bank account?Yeah, first, since you brought it up let's start with how has the OP managed to be on this forum for over 20 years but hasn't managed to ever have a bank account? And if we take him at his word, then he's also never had a job!
That's why I'm so p**sed at my PM which wants to deny my right to self defense.He's in Canada. And I don't believe they have a right to self defense.
OK, let’s not go down this road, because your PM and his policies are intrinsically political.That's why I'm so p**sed at my PM which wants to deny my right to self defense.