Insane Electric Rate Increase $508.68/1522 kWh

Since solar is an offset to electric charges is part of this thread, thought to share my electric bill.

We purchased the home and were required to assume a $47k USD solar loan, that is at a two percent interest rate. Our bill averages $12 USD per month, but that low bill comes with a $47 thousand dollar liability. If the solar fails tomorrow, we still owe $47k USD and then have a normal electric bill. Of note, the solar company went out of business, so no warranty, but I still am on the hook for $47k USD.

View attachment 283203
So basically you shouldn't have bought the house. Otherwise you have forfeited any right to complain about the solar lease that you agreed to buy.
 
Since solar is an offset to electric charges is part of this thread, thought to share my electric bill.

We purchased the home and were required to assume a $47k USD solar loan, that is at a two percent interest rate. Our bill averages $12 USD per month, but that low bill comes with a $47 thousand dollar liability. If the solar fails tomorrow, we still owe $47k USD and then have a normal electric bill. Of note, the solar company went out of business, so no warranty, but I still am on the hook for $47k USD.

View attachment 283203
Yeah, that math would never pencil for me. Solar irradiance in Ontario is much poorer than New Mexico, and $47,000 USD is $64,283 Canadian. My last bill for 1,441kWh was $206.27, so at that rate, $64K would buy me 312 months of electricity, 26 YEARS worth.

Now, at PGE rates, the math changes, but we can't ignore the fact that these rates are what they are in large part due to schemes like NEM/NEM2.
California electricity prices.webp


Let's just fudge average E-TOU-D and say that rate ends up being an average of 50 cents USD, that's 68.4 cents Canadian. No idea how that would look with all the other stuff like distribution and taxes, but let's call it 75 cents Canadian. That would make my bill $1,080. All of a sudden our 64K solar system is paid off in 59 months; ~5 years.

So it really depends on what you are paying. In places with inexpensive electricity, solar becomes much harder to justify, particularly at northern latitudes with poorer irradiance.
 
Last edited:
Some people like Jeff got access to deals like NEM/NEM2 that pay generously for the electricity fed back into the grid, in his case it's at 37 cents per kWh.
For 37 cents a KWH I would put panels on every square inch of my property and the dogs would have small ones on their back.

Our kWh is $0146 and there is a $11 facility charge.
 
Since solar is an offset to electric charges is part of this thread, thought to share my electric bill.

We purchased the home and were required to assume a $47k USD solar loan, that is at a two percent interest rate. Our bill averages $12 USD per month, but that low bill comes with a $47 thousand dollar liability. If the solar fails tomorrow, we still owe $47k USD and then have a normal electric bill. Of note, the solar company went out of business, so no warranty, but I still am on the hook for $47k USD.

View attachment 283203
Can you ever collect the $6966 "banked" back?
 
So basically you shouldn't have bought the house. Otherwise you have forfeited any right to complain about the solar lease that you agreed to buy.
Posted facts. Not sure a complaint was part of the post.

Some might find the facts helpful as part of their assessment if solar is a value added proposition to offset monthly electric charges.

We are very glad to have purchased the home, which was an interim solution to being essentially homeless. Yes, some of the conditions of the home purchase were not what we had liked, but we knew exactly what we signed up for.
 
Last edited:
I suspect not.
It looks like you have tons of credits so your bill essentially will be minimum bill for ever until you chew those credits back. Your system seems oversized imo.

Luckily panels and inverters are pretty reliable so if it's been a few years you should be ok for a bit
 
  • Like
Reactions: GON
Can you ever collect the $6966 "banked" back?

Typically you get a check at year end worth a tiny fraction of what the electricity is actually worth to you. Not enough for a bad lunch.

About the best you can do is try to consume it in a productive fashion during the year by monitoring what you make and use fairly closely, or you end up bascially giving away the overage.

Running high amp loads like pools and jacuzzis, car charging will really bleed off overage fast.

Notice the large spikes - thats a jacuzzi and pool taking turns holding temps. The one on the far left feels like the waveform itself is giving me the middle finger.



Screenshot 2025-06-04 at 5.07.31 PM.webp
 
It looks like you have tons of credits so your bill essentially will be minimum bill for ever until you chew those credits back. Your system seems oversized imo.

Luckily panels and inverters are pretty reliable so if it's been a few years you should be ok for a bit
We have tons of sun. Only my Wife and me, and I am currently working away from home, so essentially my wife.

We are of a generation to be very frugal with energy, regardless if the energy is pricey or free.

The energy usage might be very different with a family of six living in the home, instead of a frugal minded 60 year old woman.
 
What my electric bill doesn't reflect is the $4200 bill I paid this month to exterminate pigeons that nested under the solar panels. Homes without solar panels in our subdivision do not have pigeon nesting issues on their roofs.

Of course, as part of the $50k USD solar system purchase by the previous owners, pigeon shields should have been installed. Likely a few hundred dollars at time of installing of the solar panels. But the residential solar business on a macro basis appears to be a very slimy business. Without a doubt the solar company has full awareness pigeons will nest under the rooftop solar panels in our region.
 
Last edited:
Posted facts. Not sure a complaint was part of the post.

Some might find the facts helpful as part of their assessment if solar is a value added proposition to offset monthly electric charges.

We are very glad to have purchased the home, which was an interim solution to being essentially homeless. Yes, some of the conditions of the home purchase were not what we had liked, but we knew exactly what we signed up for.
Unfortunately I have seen many posts across a number of forums regarding people assuming solar leases. The originatotors of these leases had no idea what they were signing. The people assuming them genrally have no idea either. Can these leases be terminated? Yes - provided you pay a buch of $$$ to have the panels removed. That;s the hook in these deals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GON
What my electric bill doesn't reflect is the $4200 bill I paid this month to exterminate pigeons that nested under the solar panels. Homes without solar panels in our subdivision do not have pigeon nesting issues on their roofs.
This was a requirement for the warranty on my Panasonic Evervolt panels. The cost was truly negilble. Sorry that you have bought into a bad deal.
 
Unfortunately I have seen many posts across a number of forums regarding people assuming solar leases. The originatotors of these leases had no idea what they were signing. The people assuming them genrally have no idea either. Can these leases be terminated? Yes - provided you pay a buch of $$$ to have the panels removed. That;s the hook in these deals.
Although I have not researched, I would have preferred to assume a bad solar lease over a solar loan. Only reason is this is a interim house, and as you implied buyers will likely not want to assume a solar loan, but may more willing accept assuming a solar lease.
 
This was a requirement for the warranty on my Panasonic Evervolt panels. The cost was truly negilble. Sorry that you have bought into a bad deal.
The positives far exceed the negative. The solar, which was a very bad deal, was the only negative.

Of note, many California lobbyist made six to seven figure salaries and bonuses annually lobbying federal solar legislation which was forced on all 50 states. This was a involuntarily transfer of wealth in certain aspects, not a energy solution for the nation.

Follow the money.
 
Living in south western Pa. I never could see the benefit of installing solar. It's far cheaper for me to spend around $2,200 to make my home as energy efficient as possible. Air sealing, increasing attic insulation to R-60. The new attic insulation cost me roughly $1700. Last year before investing my time, energy and materials making my home more energy efficient, I use to get notices from my electric company that my energy use was between three and five percent above or below the average of the top twenty percent most energy efficient homes around me. Last summer after being around fifty percent done with the project I averaged 24.5% below that top 20% in my energy use. This summer mid June to Mid September I'm hoping to be at least 35% below that average of the top 20%. of the most energy efficient homes. BTW my house is 1700 sqft and was built in 1960. Just because your home is older doesn't mean you can't make it much more energy efficient without breaking the bank. You have high utilities find out why by getting an energy audit. They don't cost much in some cases most power companies as well as some counties and states offer them up for free or maybe $100-$200. I know a guy who's a Certified Home Energy Auditor on YouTube out of Maryland that does them for $100. Plus many utility companies, counties and states offer up some pretty sizable rebates if you get a contractor to do the work to remedy the situation.

When you get an energy audit in most cases they'll take you around and show you everywhere in the house where you're losing energy. Maybe the AC or furnace aren't running at their most efficient state. How much to get a HVAC guy in to do a routine service and tune up on them? You might have leaking ducts that's hurting the efficiency of the system. You may only have to seal the joints between the sections. Air leakage around your supply and return vents? How much for some caulking? How about leaking windows? Caulking and some weather striping? Have hot spots around the house? WHY? Maybe it's just some insulation that was moved or not installed correctly that needs to be put back into place in the attic? Maybe you'll need to air seal and increase the insulation in the attic. Leaking seal around a door? What $20-$30 at Lowes or Home Depot for a new seal and 30 minutes of your time? It's never one thing but lots of little problems that add up to much higher utility bills.

You get the point.

If you have high energy bills please spend a few bucks and have an Certified energy expert come in and take a look around before you spend thousands on new windows, doors or a roof solar panel system.
 
...

Of note, many California lobbyist made six to seven figure salaries and bonuses annually lobbying federal solar legislation which was forced on all 50 states. This was a involuntarily transfer of wealth in certain aspects, not a energy solution for the nation.

Follow the money.

So what was the solar legislation forced on all 50 states? There are zero "requirements" for residential solar in Minnesota, only tax incentives to adopt. Was it really forced on anyone then when adoption is voluntary?
 
So what was the solar legislation forced on all 50 states? There are zero "requirements" for residential solar in Minnesota, only tax incentives to adopt. Was it really forced on anyone then when adoption is voluntary?
A rebate, an incentive, grant, or like actions by the federal government is in fact an involuntary tax on working people in all 50 states. Further, legislation in just California often comes at the direct and/ or indirect cost of working people in all 50 states. Finally, since this money was borrowed to make the solar rebate, an incentive, grant, or like actions from Chinese peasents and the like, we are paying interest indefinetly on these rebates, incentives, grants, or like actions reference solar that was put into law primarily by California solar lobbyists

Here are some legislative actions on the federal level you might fight enlightning to read:
Federal Legislation:
  • SB 350:
    This law increased California's renewable energy procurement goal from 33% to 50% by 2030, driving the adoption of solar and other renewable energy sources.

    • SB 100:
      This legislation established a policy requiring renewable energy and zero-carbon resources to supply 100% of electric retail sales by 2045.
    • SB 43:
      This bill requires Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs) to procure additional renewable energy through a Green Tariff pilot program, expanding access to solar and other renewables for customers who cannot install on-site solar.
    • SB 710:
      This bill extends the property tax exemption for solar energy systems, helping to keep solar installations accessible and affordable.
    • AB 942:
      This proposed legislation, if passed, would significantly change existing net metering contracts for solar customers, potentially reducing their credits and impacting the overall cost of solar.
Impacts of Solar Legislation:
    • Increased Solar Adoption
      The California Solar Mandate and other legislation have led to a significant increase in solar PV installations across the state.
    • Reduced Reliance on Fossil Fuels:
      By promoting renewable energy sources like solar, California is working towards its goals of reducing reliance on fossil fuels and achieving a cleaner energy system.
    • Community Solar Benefits:
      Legislation like AB 1260 aims to ensure that community solar projects deliver bill savings to subscribers, particularly low-income customers, and that they contribute to the state's clean energy goals.
 
So what was the solar legislation forced on all 50 states? There are zero "requirements" for residential solar in Minnesota, only tax incentives to adopt. Was it really forced on anyone then when adoption is voluntary?

Some electric utilities have been allowed to "compensate" for the decrease in revenue from people going solar by increasing rates and fees. Others seem to have greatly reduced the programs that pay you for unused excess electricity.

In many places, if you didn't have permits and paid all the fees and taxes, the utility company will report you for unusual decreased usage and then you get a visit from the local code enforcement department to see what's going on.

As someone above said, it's all designed to transfer wealth into the "proper" hands (not yours or mine)
 
Back
Top Bottom