In praise of the cartridge oil filter

It's oil change season at the Elkins household and this week I did my Mazda6 and my wife's 2009 RAV4. The Mazda takes a 6607 size spin-on and the RAV takes a 9927 cartridge. What you're looking a here is the cartridge element from the RAV on the left next to the core of the Purolator Classic 14612 removed from the can.

I wish all my vehicles used cartridge filters because it would be nice to see the condition of the media before using it rather than after it has (or hasn't) done the job. This orange box Fram looks a lot better than the innards of the ToughGuard I pulled off my Scion last week. You can hide a lot of shoddy construction inside that metal can. Plus, there's a lot less energy-intensive metal that might end up in a landfill with a cartridge filter.

View attachment 289374
No thanks on those. Toyota has right idea: ditch the metal core and endcaps. Most oil filters I generate at home and work don’t pollute or go to “landfill”. They get crushed, put in 2000+ kiln. Then shredded and made into steel, rebar etc. I like spin on filters yes
 
I do agree that there is a benefit of actually seeing what you are putting in and also easy inspection of what comes out after oil change.
You can also test easily if bypass spring still works
 
I am sure you know that oil analysis tells only part of the story. There is more expensive analysis to count particles of different microns that is too expensive to do…
To add ... from this exercise I found no correlation between the Insolubles % and an ISO particle count when looking at many Blackstone UOAs posted on this site. There is however a correlation between filter efficiency and the resulting ISO particle count.

 
Back
Top Bottom