OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
The FACT is that most engines in most cars will outlast the usefull life of the rest of the car if manufacturers guidelines for maintenance and oil is followed. That means that Suzuki will be spitting out CV joints and needing schocks twice before that engine shows signs of degrading running supertech or any house API convientional oil.
But why not have an engine that runs like new, passes emissions with ease, and gets like new mpg up until it goes to the junkyard. Just because it still runs doesn't mean it runs well.
I stated it will run without degrading that means no loss in performance on the cheapest oil that meets spec
And I think it's greatly exaggerated the engine will ALWAYS outlast the body. Engines last a very long time on whatever you put in them but there are plenty cases where the engine goes before the body.
Please quantify your cases as a percentile of the driving public
Where I live, I guarantee the engine will go first assuming it doesn't get wrecked.
Again, Please quantify your statement with actual statistical evidence rather. Your garantee means little otherwise.
Please qualify your statement that it will "run without degrading". If I believed you, it would seem that engines don't wear out. However they do.
Engines wear out yes, but the rest of the car(auto transmissions, suspension, electircal)wear out much faster) This is a fact and arguing against the natural degrading of a automobile is your asinine task.
There is paper after paper written about the benefits of esters. There is paper after paper written about HTHS vs wear. I'm not about to waste my time because everyone here has already seen it and they pick and choose what they believe on how it fits their "beliefs".
Esters have benefits, sure. But they don't make a significant difference to the everyday auto.
Honestly, this site is not what it used to be. Everyone has an agenda and it's all about winning an argument at all costs. Now we're arguing that a grp II oil is just as good as a grp V. I feel sorry for you.
Don't feel sorry for me. This is about keeping the discusion factual. You seem to dislike facts that disprove YOUR beliefs, you do project the weakness in your arguments onto others. Therefore you either steal time from your employer or slack on yourself to assure you get the last word. .. Most of us have real jobs, and post in our limited spare time. I kinda feel sorry for you.
To the point, I can afford Redline so I use it. I want the least amount of wear in a $40,000 car so I spend an extra $20 on an oil change. Sounds like an ok investment.
It is no consequence to me what you can afford. I am sure that makes you feel good about yourself. I and many others have no need to mention what I can afford but abstain from purchasing as I have a self worth not based on how I look or what I buy or own.
This is not meant to be degrading or an insult, it is just a personality observation
I'm sorry, but I don't think there is any other way of interpreting that post other than a slanderous tirade.
Is that what this has come down to?
Because this man enjoys cars as a HOBBY, and subsequently has way more TIME invested in his ONE car than most will likely have in every car they've ever owned, and he wants to PROTECT that investment in the best way he can, he gets railroaded and attacked on a personal level for his OIL choice?
He is having his work ethic questioned, his self-esteem, life goals and everything being dragged out in some bizarre on-line psychological evaluation..... Because he voiced his opinion about oil, wear and filtration on a board who's main focus is...... oil, wear and filtration.
Go figure.
This was completely uncalled for.
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
The FACT is that most engines in most cars will outlast the usefull life of the rest of the car if manufacturers guidelines for maintenance and oil is followed. That means that Suzuki will be spitting out CV joints and needing schocks twice before that engine shows signs of degrading running supertech or any house API convientional oil.
But why not have an engine that runs like new, passes emissions with ease, and gets like new mpg up until it goes to the junkyard. Just because it still runs doesn't mean it runs well.
I stated it will run without degrading that means no loss in performance on the cheapest oil that meets spec
And I think it's greatly exaggerated the engine will ALWAYS outlast the body. Engines last a very long time on whatever you put in them but there are plenty cases where the engine goes before the body.
Please quantify your cases as a percentile of the driving public
Where I live, I guarantee the engine will go first assuming it doesn't get wrecked.
Again, Please quantify your statement with actual statistical evidence rather. Your garantee means little otherwise.
Please qualify your statement that it will "run without degrading". If I believed you, it would seem that engines don't wear out. However they do.
Engines wear out yes, but the rest of the car(auto transmissions, suspension, electircal)wear out much faster) This is a fact and arguing against the natural degrading of a automobile is your asinine task.
There is paper after paper written about the benefits of esters. There is paper after paper written about HTHS vs wear. I'm not about to waste my time because everyone here has already seen it and they pick and choose what they believe on how it fits their "beliefs".
Esters have benefits, sure. But they don't make a significant difference to the everyday auto.
Honestly, this site is not what it used to be. Everyone has an agenda and it's all about winning an argument at all costs. Now we're arguing that a grp II oil is just as good as a grp V. I feel sorry for you.
Don't feel sorry for me. This is about keeping the discusion factual. You seem to dislike facts that disprove YOUR beliefs, you do project the weakness in your arguments onto others. Therefore you either steal time from your employer or slack on yourself to assure you get the last word. .. Most of us have real jobs, and post in our limited spare time. I kinda feel sorry for you.
To the point, I can afford Redline so I use it. I want the least amount of wear in a $40,000 car so I spend an extra $20 on an oil change. Sounds like an ok investment.
It is no consequence to me what you can afford. I am sure that makes you feel good about yourself. I and many others have no need to mention what I can afford but abstain from purchasing as I have a self worth not based on how I look or what I buy or own.
This is not meant to be degrading or an insult, it is just a personality observation
I'm sorry, but I don't think there is any other way of interpreting that post other than a slanderous tirade.
Is that what this has come down to?
Because this man enjoys cars as a HOBBY, and subsequently has way more TIME invested in his ONE car than most will likely have in every car they've ever owned, and he wants to PROTECT that investment in the best way he can, he gets railroaded and attacked on a personal level for his OIL choice?
He is having his work ethic questioned, his self-esteem, life goals and everything being dragged out in some bizarre on-line psychological evaluation..... Because he voiced his opinion about oil, wear and filtration on a board who's main focus is...... oil, wear and filtration.
Go figure.
This was completely uncalled for.