My colleague who is now retired, used to say "Failing to plan, is planning to fail". I love that saying and use it all the time.Those who fail to prepare are foolish.
My colleague who is now retired, used to say "Failing to plan, is planning to fail". I love that saying and use it all the time.Those who fail to prepare are foolish.
Years is still an OCI multiple volume, not an overall volume of oil they have hoarded. Here's some API SF oil being used which is probably 20+ years old.So, where does the “10-15-20” years supply he refers to come from, if not his own strawman?
Here's a good example of quite a collection. But he could service 20 cars, who knows? I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Point being, there are some people here with A LOT of oil.Not one person has said that they keep that much.
Yes, I think we all agree. I took it as an endearing term.One, I believe that the term “Hoarders” was meant in jest, or playfulness, by the OP. Nobody replying in this thread shows signs of the mental illness of true hoarding.
I did not call "anyone" simply with more oil a hoarder. I commented on the "hoarding" that's been discussed for over a decade here. I've seen pictures of (nearly) and entire room filled with oil. I spoke mainly of hoarding obsolete classifications.What hoarding? I think this was the point. It's a bit insulting to call someone with more oil a hoarder.
OH, so if just I dare to express a reasoned opinion then I am presenting a "straw man" and "RANTING". How judgmental.So, where does the “10-15-20” years supply he refers to come from, if not his own strawman?
I’m trying to figure out the parameters against which he’s ranting.
Not one person has said that they keep that much.
The closest anyone every came was the guy with a hallway full of oil (and tires in his bathtub) but even he planned to flip it.
You’re right, I am, indeed, arguing against a straw man, but it’s the straw man created by @gfh77665
You are wrong...you missed where I said "I would not want" older classifications. (but it might be fine for you)You're wrong about that, I'm still using SF rated oil.![]()
Two more thoughts -
One, I believe that the term “Hoarders” was meant in jest, or playfulness, by the OP. Nobody replying in this thread shows signs of the mental illness of true hoarding. So, ranting against people with that illness is misplaced..
Because you stated that you didn’t understand. You stated 10-15-20 years’ supply.That term has been used so many times here over the past decade + it would be hard to count.
SUDDENLY I use it and a meltdown of hurt feeling ensues. Why is that? What suddenly changed?
How does “an entire room full” of oil turn into your 10-20 years ?I did not call "anyone" simply with more oil a hoarder. I commented on the "hoarding" that's been discussed for over a decade here. I've seen pictures of (nearly) and entire room filled with oil. I spoke mainly of hoarding obsolete classifications.
Try giving me the benefit of the doubt "just once". You might be amazed.
Again, he is an extreme outlier. When a multitude of automotive topics are discussed here, no one officially disclaims "there may be certain rare circumstances where this does not apply..." and you never challenge it, except with me. No one else here talks in legalese, so I don't either.How does “an entire room full” of oil turn into your 10-20 years ?
Even the guy who bought 100 jugs, and had it everywhere in his apartment, was a car flipper and planned to use it all that year.
Again, the judgement was on your end, presuming that a room full of oil meant decades, when clearly, other people buy and use oil differently than you.
Okay - then show me a post where somebody said they have decades worth of oil. Their use pattern. Not an interpretation.Again, he is an extreme outlier. When a multitude of automotive topics are discussed here, no one officially disclaims "there may be certain rare circumstances where this does not apply..." and you never challenge it, except with me. No one else here talks in legalese, so I don't either.
I apologize if my response seemed like a personal attack, that was not my intent. My comment to you was in jest, hence the laughing emoji.You are wrong...you missed where I said "I would not want" older classifications. (but it might be fine for you)
That's the exact definition of an expressed opinion.
Seems almost anyone's opinion is welcomed here, except for mine. Mine is called nasty names like "judgment, ranting, and strawman".