Originally Posted By: Trav
Honestly I wouldn't even give this a second thought. IMO the belt will be as good as the day it was made, if the cardboard box its in isn't deteriorating I doubt the tough rubber belt inside is.
As far as Amazon reviews go when someones something like it broke in X amount of time or miles they tend to leave out the rest of the story.
My brother Bob the moron tightened the thing as tight as a bow string, it was only making a little noise so we figured it would stretch to fit, then it broke. Amazon review = Don't buy this piece of junk it broke in 25K.
Trav, if you eliminated all items from your life with Amazon negative reviews you would be living in the woods under a rock. Eg, I have two Samsung Smart TV’s, both a few years old and both with beautiful pictures and flawless performance. Got them both from Amazon even though they had 10-15% one star ratings from people who claimed these TVs are nothing but pure junk. So, who on this planet makes a better TV than Samsung? LG? Check out their Amazon reviews.
Re the belt, I was not arguing against the NOS Gates belt (unless it is really 10 years old)...just saying I would have used the Mitsuboshi belt already paid for in the kit. OP thinks because his vehicle came with Mitsuboshi accessory belt and Gates Unitta timing belt, Honda considers Mitsuboshi inferior for timing belt service. Totally erroneous conclusion imo. I would be more concerned about “set” in the NOS belt than rubber deterioration.