06RANGER
Thread starter
Perhaps Honda thinks it can sell more cars by recommending "a less than optimal" OCI sticking with the low maintenance theme.
Yeah, right.quote:
Originally posted by 06RANGER:
Perhaps Honda thinks it can sell more cars by recommending "a less than optimal" OCI sticking with the low maintenance theme.
quote:
Originally posted by thooks:
Originally posted by 06RANGER:
[qb] . . . Bottom line is they are more likely to outlast anything else on the road with better maintenance and people have a hard time getting over that.Hondas are nice and generally trouble-free. And they don't turn into rust heaps after 6 years like they used to.
But I'll still take a Volvo over a Honda when it comes to longevity.
Considering their sales advantage, I still see more older Volvos than Hondas around these parts. I don't see many '80s Preludes or Civics (and the few I do see are usually beat to he**), but I see plenty of 240s and 740s. It may be a purely economic thing. Volvo owners, having invested more up front, may just hold them longer.quote:
Originally posted by Schmoe:
I think Honda has matched longevity with Volvo, then when you take into consideration the availability of parts, I'd still stick with Honda.