Thanks for jumping in. Dave mentioned that in an earlier post.Dave said they’re waiting on delivery of a raw material. Then it will be available.
Thanks for jumping in. Dave mentioned that in an earlier post.Dave said they’re waiting on delivery of a raw material. Then it will be available.
Should one assume from this that 0W-X oils cannot be produces without VIIs?Well it took a week longer than planned but we have the No VII series of oils put together. They are consistent with the respective PCMO and Euro series.
https://www.hplubricants.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/No-VII-Engine-Oil-PDS.pdf
Read the whole thread, it’s full of additional info.Should one assume from this that 0W-X oils cannot be produces without VIIs?
They can, however the results aren't up to the standards of @High Performance Lubricants. This company holds itself to very high standards.Should one assume from this that 0W-X oils cannot be produces without VIIs?
I skimmed it and didn't catch anything useful. It seems to me that anything with a low 0W-20 spread should be achievable without VIIs. That being said, if they cannot make a 0W-16 without VIIs then I need some serious education.Read the whole thread, it’s full of additional info.
Nice HTHS viscosity. Now people who's vehicle OM and oil fill cap recommends 5W-30 can go down a grade and say their living on the edge by using a 5W-20.The 5W-20 has a KV100 of 8.70 cSt and HTHS of 3.267 cP. That oil is a beast.
Maybe I missed it, but are you going to have any Noack specs on these no VII products?The goal with these was to make a lower volatility No VII group of products.
I think @High Performance Lubricants just blew all the thinnies’ minds by turning their 5w20 into a 5w30. Or did they make the 5w30 a 5w20 without fuel dilution or mechanical shearing? Is this now the first trans oil that can be used in an engine?Nice HTHS viscosity. Now people who's vehicle OM and oil fill cap recommends 5W-30 can go down a grade and say their living on the edge by using a 5W-20.![]()
![]()
This is a @Shannow 5W-20, lol.I think @High Performance Lubricants just blew all the thinnies’ minds by turning their 5w20 into a 5w30. Or did they make the 5w30 a 5w20 without fuel dilution or mechanical shearing? Is this now the first trans oil that can be used in an engine?
I jest, but this is going to be a great oil for many people.
Maybe I missed it, but are you going to have any Noack specs on these no VII products?
What's the NOACK number you'd like to see?Maybe I missed it, but are you going to have any Noack specs on these no VII products?
How did you know it was oxidized?Unfortunately NOACK isn't everything when it comes to a finished product. I ran Red Line 5W-30 (advertised NOACK of 6%) in a 3.3L GDI engine. I ran it for 6800 miles. Towards the end of the OCI it started consuming oil and it was pretty badly oxidized. I don't have the patience to do UOAs, and since I wasn't planning on running Red Line again, I didn't take a sample.
It thickened and was dark brown. Since I don't short trip this vehicle and drive it pretty healthy, I get a minimal amount of soot in the oil. I ran Mobil 1 FS 0W-40, Castrol EDGE 0W-40, and QS Euro 5W-40 in this engine for similar or longer OCIs, and none of them looked as bad as RL 5W-30 after *only* 6800 miles. Thick, very dark, and smelly. It also left oxidation residue on the oil filler cap. Interestingly enough, I was able to wipe it off without too much effort. Had it not been for the high oil consumption, I wouldn't have said anything about RL 5W-30. But that kinda bothered me. An oil with such low NOACK should stay in the pan.How did you know it was oxidized?
I don't think those are scientifically valid methods of determining oxidation.It thickened and was dark brown. Since I don't short trip this vehicle and drive it pretty healthy, I get a minimal amount of soot in the oil. I ran Mobil 1 FS 0W-40, Castrol EDGE 0W-40, and QS Euro 5W-40 in this engine for similar or longer OCIs, and none of them looked as bad as RL 5W-30 after *only* 6800 miles. Thick, very dark, and smelly. It also left oxidation residue on the oil filler cap. Interestingly enough, I was able to wipe it off without too much effort. Had it not been for the high oil consumption, I wouldn't have said anything about RL 5W-30. But that kinda bothered me. An oil with such low NOACK should stay in the pan.
I know scientifically that Red Line starts out with a pretty healthy amount of oxidation, and then oxidizes even further in service. And it does so pretty fast. For Red Line it's a feature, not a bug. It's how this oil works. I got nothing against it, other than the sudden consumption that bothered me, in an otherwise healthy engine.I don't think those are scientifically valid methods of determining oxidation.
RL's high oxidation numbers, when new, are not due to actual oxidation. They are due to its ester content and FTIR analysis tends to reflect that in an arguably inaccurate manner.I know scientifically that Red Line starts out with a pretty healthy amount of oxidation, and then oxidizes even further in service. And it does so pretty fast. For Red Line it's a feature, not a bug. It's how this oil works. I got nothing against it, other than the sudden consumption that bothered me, in an otherwise healthy engine.
I was using this as a counter example as to why NOACK can't be used as a determining factor to judge the quality of any motor oil.
How do you know? Do you poses intimate knowledge of how Red Line is formulated?RL's high oxidation numbers, when new, are not due to actual oxidation.
That's not accurate. The amount of ester content cannot be determined by the virgin oxidation number, if that's what you're referring to. Maybe @MolaKule could chime in on this.They are due to its ester content and FTIR analysis tends to reflect that in an arguably inaccurate manner.
I know you don't. It's okay.Similarly, I do not see how this has anything to do with NOACK.