No problem. You simply save to Windows format. Been doing it for decades and made many documents that anyone can open. Or not if I chose to lock, encrypt, or PW protect them the same as MS Office docs.
It almost never works cleanly with layouts that contain multiple text boxes, graphics, and complex formatting. For example, if ComEd creates an invoice in word and we open it LO, there will be multiple formatting issues with the location of text boxes, fillable text, etc to the point where the project managers and accountants will have to waste time reorganizing and fixing the invoice. The employees cannot waste their time fixing things like that because their time is billable to a project. Then if we save it as a docx from LO and ComEd opens it up, the formatting on their end is all screwed up, they push it back to us, and the PM/Accountant has to waste more time trying to fix it.
In a business setting, people just want two things, 1. for it to work and 2. for it to be familiar. If they've used Windows their entire life then they know where certain things are as well as QOL stuff like keybinds. Calc does not have the same keybindings as Excel so a database admin or accountant who is used to the keybinds for Excel will have to relearn; and that's even more of a waste of time considering some users are unable or unwilling to learn the change.
There is a movement across European governments to abandon Microsoft and move 100% to an open source OS and open source Office. It puts the user in control of their own data.
The other 90% of the world is on Windows. If you want a mandated Linux in federal computers, you can move to the EU. Tbh, Europe doesn't like individualism or [seemingly] capitalism very much though like mandating apple to change from the Lightning to USBC
Linux admins are harder to find and cost more than a Windows admin. Windows Server is relatively easy to learn because the GUI makes things simple so a junior admin can learn and set things up themselves. So if your environment is already built upon a Windows domain, you're saving money in licensing while end up losing money in capital expenses. Talking about SMBs though, not enterprises/datacenters as I'm no linux expert and the majroity of experience I have with Linux is vmware and proxmox.
Then there are issues with commonly used programs in various industries that do not support linux. In my case, many popular lawyer or AEC programs do not support Linux and I have absolutely zero intentions of installing a T2 hypervisor so the user can get worse performance on 90% of their programs because Linux and LibreOffice is free.
But most of issues is between the seat and the keyboard or from some bogus third party program like those OEM driver updaters that are installed on every computer. Linux won't save the guy that clicks on "hot single moms in your area" ads.
With that said, I'm not against Linux. Use it if it works for you, that's fine. But assuming it's going to work for everyone is too far fetched a statement to even think that the other 95% of users on Windows around the world will switch over because you like it. However I do need to buy some Linux for dummies books to help me with VMware and proxmox.