WAIT. The guy was driving with a known hole in the block?
What a mess. Weird!
What a mess. Weird!
I had to read that like 10 times. Its the most poorly written piece I have seen in a while. Its written out of order.WAIT. The guy was driving with a known hole in the block?
What a mess. Weird!
At $60,000/hour, couldn't hurt.Do you guys think Toyota would honor the warranty if this person hired a lawyer, and had the lawyer send Toyota a letter?
Maybe. With these kind of stories I assume there's more to it than what we've been told. If I were the owner I would at least talk to an attorney and see what my option are. Ideally I'd want Toyota to buy the car back and never do business with them again.Do you guys think Toyota would honor the warranty if this person hired a lawyer, and had the lawyer send Toyota a letter?
At least it wasn't denied for a non certified oil that many worry about.Obviously, with the right tires the engine would not have blown.
Except pass one just cost them a bunch of public goodwill.Inexperienced lawyer trying an initial scare letter. Guessing it is a template and you pick a denial and hope pass 1 customer does not bother / accepts it.
So onto pass 2.
Steve Lehto in the video above says they don't say that in their letter, and all that other stuff seems irrelevant. Mr. Lehto is a lawyer in Michigan with quite a following.Assuming the complete truth is as presented, and it is on YouTube so we can assume it is, I read this as the warranty is denied due to the prior accident damage (which sound rather severe) and not the speed. No where does Toyota state that the denial is due to the speed, it appears to be noted as a corporate CYA. That said, the Toyota letter is somewhat clumsily worded. Curious as to the complete story.....
Yes, joking aside, they are denying b/c of the accident but their response was strange as the lawyer noted in the video. Not sure how a minor/repairable accident caused a thrown rod/hole in the block (assuming that is what happened) but I'd just let my insurance company deal with it.Assuming the complete truth is as presented, and it is on YouTube so we can assume it is, I read this as the warranty is denied due to the prior accident damage (which sound rather severe) and not the speed. No where does Toyota state that the denial is due to the speed, it appears to be noted as a corporate CYA. That said, the Toyota letter is somewhat clumsily worded. Curious as to the complete story.....
100%, he's the lemon law/warranty guy. Like the GR86s that got social-media attention to force Toyota's hand, so will this.Steve Lehto in the video above says they don't say that in their letter, and all that other stuff seems irrelevant. Mr. Lehto is a lawyer in Michigan with quite a following.
My guess is they handed this to some Junior attorney and told them they to make this go away. They tried to be heavy handed. If Steve Lehto has a piece out the entire automotive world will know shortly.
I am sure the Toyota Marketing people are currently fit to be tied also.
Your extrapolation skills are fined tuned.The age of Toyota reliability has ended long ago with these smaller shorter turbo charged displacement engines, 0-20w to match with a sports car is one clown combo to advertise as track ready vehicle. I remember reading technical engine reviews that recommended to stay clear after a few generations. Some outstanding Technical Service Bulletins are starting to pop up as time goes related to these engines.
I like how calm the driver was during the whole ordeal, that dash cam is probably getting more attention for whoever makes them haha.
Toyota 0w-20.mp4 moment.
There was a GR Yaris that exploded on the track somewhere in Europe I believe the driver was running OEM 0w-20 oil that was posted on YT long ago that was also denied warranty. This really falls under the subject of lemon laws if a car can't handle what its made to do out of the factory.
I wouldn't touch a new Toyota these days but the older models with re-known engines are worth a gander if taken well care of by previous owners.