Science says pre-filling doesn’t matter… but my gut (and Grandpa’s ‘72 Chevy) disagree
Let me start by saying Freedom Worx deserves a medal for doing what most of us wouldn’t—sacrificing 12 hours and 50 filters to science

. The oil analysis showing
no difference in wear metals between pre-filled and dry filters is fascinating. But here’s where my inner grease monkey raises an eyebrow: If it truly doesn’t matter, why do heavy-duty manufacturers like Cummins explicitly tell you to pre-fill filters in their manuals? Are we really saying fleet mechanics rebuilding million-mile engines are just… superstitious?
The SAE papers cited about cold starts vs. oil pressure are solid gold

. But let’s not ignore the elephant in the room:
Oil viscosity matters more than we’re admitting. If cold starts are the real wear culprit (and they are), why are we pretending 0w-8 in a hybrid is the same game as 15w-40 in a ‘99 Powerstroke? Thinner oils flow faster, sure—but what about that first crank on a -10°F morning when your oil’s the consistency of maple syrup? I’ll bet my left lug nut that 5 seconds of “dry” flow with 0w-20 is less risky than 2 seconds with 10w-30.
Props to the SAE for noting that contaminants kill engines, not filter rituals. But let’s be real: If you’re dumping fresh oil straight into the filter’s outlet port (looking at you, YouTubers), you’re basically giving your bearings a glitter bomb

. Maybe OEMs warn against pre-filling not because of “myths,” but because 90% of us can’t pour without spilling bacon bits into the galley.
Final thought: The video’s data is airtight… for this specific small block. But until I see the same test on a 6.7L diesel with 2 quarts of filter to prime, I’ll keep pre-filling my HD rigs and laugh when the 0w-16 crowd’s Camry starts rattling like a maraca at 150k.