Ford Reusing Taurus Name

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:


And look at the bright side: at least they didn't stick an "I'm sucking a lemon" grille on it and rename it "Edsel"!
wink.gif
tongue.gif
cheers.gif





Where exactly is the bright side? It's an 'I am a cheese grater' grill and a re-hashed name.

The fundamental problem with the 500 is that the Fusion is the bread and butter sedan (rentals and Nascar) and the Crown Vic is the cushy big car (cops and taxis). Who asked for the 500?
 
Quote:


Quote:


And look at the bright side: at least they didn't stick an "I'm sucking a lemon" grille on it and rename it "Edsel"!
wink.gif
tongue.gif
cheers.gif





Where exactly is the bright side? It's an 'I am a cheese grater' grill and a re-hashed name.

The fundamental problem with the 500 is that the Fusion is the bread and butter sedan (rentals and Nascar) and the Crown Vic is the cushy big car (cops and taxis). Who asked for the 500?




Point well taken. How 'bout "slightly less dim side"?

I also enjoy the text at the links provided above. Five hundred improved features, blah, blah. This raises many troubling yet also amusing questions. Was this a Freudian slip? Was the initial version of the car so bad that it needed improvements in five hundred different ways? OK, stepping up to the 3.5L is a great move for this car, but what were the other 499?
 
Why reinvent the wheel?

Taurus is a known name and no need to spend endless money marketing it. Also the next fleet buyer who calls will just ask for the Taurus. They don't care what they look like etc just price.

Smart move on Ford's part.
 
Does anyone have access to Taurus sales, by year, for its run from 1986-2006 that they can post? If I remember right Taurus sales nosedived with the 1996 ovoid redesign which made the car look much smaller (truly a love-it or hate-it design). The way I see it, they are shooting for the sales numbers they had in the late-80s and early 90s, which is going to be an iffy proposition; its not like it'll jump right up to 400,000 or so just because of the name.
 
Five Hundred is a better name than Taurus.

I find the recent articles about the name change to be humorous. The articles say that the new CEO asked everyone why they did not name the new Sedan the Taurus and no one had a reason. Derrrr.... Sounds like a well run company to me!

CEO calls a meeting of VP's.

"OK guys/gals, why didn't you use the Taurus name for the new sedan? Why did you call it the Five Hundred. ....Silence.... Well, I want to call it the Taurus, since Taurus was the number one selling sedan! What do you say guys?"

"Good idea sir! Lets go for it! I'll write the press release."
 
Ford seems so lost to me. Much more of this name switching will get them into a situation where they have no recognized names on any of their cars besides the Mustang. Branding is SO important. Why do you think the Camry is such a recognizable name in the industry? Hasn't it been around since 1983 or so? The Taurus eventually became a stale cake with more and more icing piled on it, so the natural choice was to completely redesign it instead of creating a new car with a new name...and only after they had a new, more viable engine to drop in it (Can you say 3.5?). Dummies.
 
Maybe GM now figures once they outlast Ford... the Ford diehard will turn to GM before they buy foreign.
 
Ford had a short-lived policy of giving its car models names beginning with F. Probably done because owners of certain Ford models were giving their cars other, more obscene names beginning with F.
laugh.gif
Renaming the Five Hundred the Taurus and the Freestyle the Taurus X actually smacks of sense for once.

I guess we should be lucky the Mustang wasn't renamed the Fustang.

The real desperation is in the name changes at Lincoln. Why introduce a new car with the grand old name of Zephyr, just to rename it the MKZ a year later? All the changes to MK + whatever are silly, will confuse customers from similarity, and are an obvious attempt to ape Cadillac's similar name changes (Seville to STS, etc.). Lincoln should keep original names.

I fear that Ford has a long way to go before it finds its way out of the woods—if it does in time. Resurrecting the Taurus name can only help, though.
 
I really hope that Ford is going into this knowing that the renaming of the 500 will only be a very temporary band aid. Using the Taurus name is a good idea, but the rest of the car is just not competitive enough, IMO. I think they need to get their best minds (people who designed the 1997 F-150?) together and build something from scratch that does more than just match the competition. They need to make the Taurus desireable again, like it was in the 80s. Recyling parts and changing names around has never worked well for them in the past...putting their best minds to work to make something all new that is completely theirs has (1986 Taurus, 1983 Thunderbird, 1997 F-150, 1991 Explorer, 1979 Mustang etc...). I know Ford is capable of building a really great car, but right now they are just throwing any old design or name change out there in the desperate hope that it will increase sales.

As for the Fusion, while I think it is a really good car, I do not see it as a Taurus replacement. It seems to be more of a Contour replacement to me. I think they should have named the Lincoln version the Continental from the very start. While the Zephyr name has history, it just does not fit the car. MKZ is just meaningless.

And when did the three bar design become Ford's signature? Just because the Fusion had it and now the Taurus does it is now a signature? They need to find a more appealing signature.
 
If the Fiero had been a decent product (to begin with), Pontiac would have used the name again for their new roadster. Same with the Ford Escort, but they went with Focus. Fiesta still lives in Europe with a very tasty little car that could give Fit (Jazz) and Rabbit (Golf) [other name-game players, but for different reasons] some competition and run circles around Aveo and any other Korean mini sold here.
But marketers are more fickle than even the consumers, especially in these difficult times, so they plunder and desecrate old names, thinking it's all about the name. But it's still about the product, stupid!
 
The old Taurus was a very polarizing car...there are people that love them and others that wouldn't drive one on a bet. I would call its reputation tepid, at best having rented a few in my lifetime. But..even if Ford thinks "Taurus" brings a huge reputation with it, nothing is going to help that yawn-inducing 500 sell any better. This is a typical failing of American carmakers. Don't change the product...change the name and we'll see how many people we can fool.

My advice...just leave the name alone, re-style it and give it some personality, put the 3.5 in it and call it a day.
 
Moribundman, I meant that Ford had temporarily imposed a policy of giving or renaming all of its cars names beginning with F. Hence my Mustang/"Fustang" joke. But I suspect you knew that.
smile.gif
 
I'm impressed with the specs on the new Ford Taurus, at least according to the Ford PR release. 260hp on a Taurus, I bet they couldn't have even imagined that when it came out in 1985!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom