Originally Posted By: badtlc
As a Mazda fan, don't fall for the Mazda6 being a Fusion clone. That used to be close to the truth but it ain't so much anymore. The mazda is a drivers car but it can't compete with the fusion on the practical level. The transmissions in the Mazda (especially the 6i) keep it from being a realistic competitor to the Fusion due to the significantly worse MPGs.
Actually, the quality differences (and complaints) between the two models prevent the Mazda 6 from competing on a practical level. So they are far from clones. Check out Consumers Reports repair history. You would have to "beat the bushes long and hard" to find a dissatisfied Fusion owner. I convinced my sister to "give it a look," as a replacement for her aging, no heat, no air conditioning, '98 Oldsmobile Intrigue. She bought a 2010, 4 cylinder Fusion SE. After the first 5,000 miles, she is still raving about how much a "drivers car this is." Zero problems, or reasons to return it to the dealer.
I was just reading today's USA Today Automobile Test Drive question and answer column by James Healy. Monday, they are publishing a $25K family Sedan shootout. He is finding that in recent years, Honda's interior refinement quality and overall refinement quality, has slipped, and is is not what it was. So picking the Fusion would be a no brainer.