Originally Posted By: DBMaster
Here is one of those opinion statements I like to announce. I changed my brake fluid every 30,000 miles on my 1989 Honda Accord - religiously. The master cylinder had to be replaced about every 100,000 miles due to design of the M/C? Who knows? On the up side, I never had to rebuild a cylinder/caliper or replace a hose in over 350,000 miles.
My future practice will be to replace fluid that has darkened significantly (the definition of significantly is at my discretion). It's easy to do and low cost. I just don't know if it really helps.
I kept that car 23 years. I don't ever want to do that again. No matter how well made, any vehicle will need a lot of attention to go that many miles. How many of you will keep yours that long? Most will go 100,000-200,000 miles with none of this fluid flushing/replacement needed so why mess around with it unless you REALLY want to keep it forever?
10 years / 200kmiles, give or take, not a bad lifespan for most vehicles. Heck, if you rack up more miles in less time, is the brake fluid going to be any more contaminated? Good arguement, makes me rethink doing the brake fluid on my Toyota's now that I think about it; not convinced I'm interested in the 20+ year ownership either.