Ester based motorcycle oil

I used to use Torco oils on my bikes I found esters and synthetics gave poor clutch feel. This might have changed over the years but I did get over 160 000 kilometers before totalling it when it was recalled for a hard facing issue on second gear at 89000 ks the dealer pulled it apart and said he'd never seen gears in such good condition so they replaced the rings as the gears where perfect it ran perfectly to 170.000 ks when a cager ran into me and totaled it but that's another storey
I run Torco GP7 on several MX two stroke bikes I own in the past.
Was OK in wear for such machines.
On sport bike I test two times T4SR, was really good and never spot an issue even on very aggressive runs on track.
 
Tell me about the HPL products. I see on different forums people recommending them. How do they compare to Amsoil or redline for example?
running it now, its doing its job! At 2k on the HPL 10w-40 motorcycle, not quite ready to take a sample yet though so don’t know those details. Switched from Amsoil metric 10-40 which was super stout, I have a used oil analysis on this for it.

Edit: here it is, if you are interested. I also ride this bike hard, daily.
 
Last edited:
If anyone was wondering, I ended up going with the Klotz TechniPlate 10w30. I have 1,500 miles on it, and the shifts have been very precise and smooth. The motor runs smoothly and cool, and the oil color still looks the same as when it went in. No complaints. I did have complaints with the three other oils I tried, if that means anything.

Next change, I'm likely going to try Amsoil to see if it can provide the same feel as Klotz, but for $13 per quart instead of $18. No need to shed tears, @Pablo.
 
I like Maxima extra 4, plenty of zzdp alot ofesters also i run it twice in my bike with viscisity 15w50 and change to Motul 300v also 15w50, because i didn't find in the market. Shifting gears is not that good with motul.
 
Bumping this thread, but if you are truly 160mph track days I would be looking into HPLs oil for this. The OCI is really going to depend on how hard you are pushing this bike, for how long, and how often. Riding habits matter a lot. Oil vaporizes in these high revvers as well, so higher quality oils can matter in trying to mitigate that.

Again, if truly a race bike (or mostly one) you should really think about HPL. What are your riding habits?
 
I wanted to chime in regarding the HP4RU that's been mentioned a couple times - details on this oil are incredibly difficult to find. What I've been able to piece together so far is it has a 10-20% ester content (at least, the only disclosed ingredient due to legal requirements on the SDS) of "Fatty Acids, C6-C12, Triesters with Trimethylolpropane".

It's definitely an ester oil, and judging from the given flash point of 507F (****, that's hot!) I think it probably has to be nearly or entirely a group IV and group V blend to achieve that high.

I'm getting a VOA through Horizon just so I have some details on the TBN, additives (that are tested for, anyway) , and the 100C viscosity to compare my used oil analysis against.

Side note, it smells incredibly good. Smells like Delsym cough syrup. Nearly took a swig to try it out, I bet it would take your cough right away.
 
Thanks for the HP4RU info. Little info out there about it and I am not pushing things to the limit that justify the cost.
 
My question is: How much better are ester-based oils (if at all) than synthetics for a high-revving motorcycle like mine?

Whether you run ester based synthetics or other major synthetics in a high revving 600 any of it will meet and exceed your racing expectations... There is no benefit among the brands based on their VOA...

I ran 5w30 Mobil 1 auto when I raced my RC45 in Super Bike category all weekend long during the Highway 40 races...

M1vRedLinevAmsoilvHonda.webp


H40Poster.webp


H40Race22.webp


H40Race39.webp
 
Whether you run ester based synthetics or other major synthetics in a high revving 600 any of it will meet and exceed your racing expectations... There is no benefit among the brands based on their VOA...

I ran 5w30 Mobil 1 auto when I raced my RC45 in Super Bike category all weekend long during the Highway 40 races...

View attachment 308115

View attachment 308117

View attachment 308118

View attachment 308119
Do you still use Mobil 1 5w30 auto oil in it? And what OCI do you use? I saw on some of your used oil analysis that the mileage was less than 1,000 on them.
 
Whether you run ester based synthetics or other major synthetics in a high revving 600 any of it will meet and exceed your racing expectations... There is no benefit among the brands based on their VOA...

I ran 5w30 Mobil 1 auto when I raced my RC45 in Super Bike category all weekend long during the Highway 40 races...

View attachment 308115

I'm not sure where is the oil sheet from, but it looks like highly unlikely to me an API SM/SN/SP/SQ (ILSAC GF-5 or GF-6) oil to has calcium 2649 ppm. The Mobil 1 5w30 oil on the sheet above it must be API SL/SJ, ILSAC GF-4.
 
For a closer understanding of the additive Calcium we can see it is used in lubricants as a detergent and dispersant additive to clean engine parts, prevent deposit formation like sludge and varnish, and keep contaminants suspended in the oil. Calcium-based additives, such as calcium salicylates and calcium sulfonates, also help neutralize acidic byproducts of combustion and can provide anti-wear and corrosion protection...

It is interesting how much the amount of the Calcium additive varies among a sampling of 30 Grades...

Red Line MC 5w30...3205
Mobil 1 5w30 Auto...........2649
Amsoil MC 10w30.....3161
Honda HP4 10w30....1917
 
Good thread, for the first time I’m departing from Honda Oil to Penrite on my CBR. Based on the previous responses, it seems the other oil vendors meet or exceed the Honda requirements. I’m always concerned when it comes to the clutch pack, but I’ll go this route and see how it works.

I went with:

MC-4ST 10W-30 (100% PAO & ESTER)​

 
For a closer understanding of the additive Calcium we can see it is used in lubricants as a detergent and dispersant additive to clean engine parts, prevent deposit formation like sludge and varnish, and keep contaminants suspended in the oil. Calcium-based additives, such as calcium salicylates and calcium sulfonates, also help neutralize acidic byproducts of combustion and can provide anti-wear and corrosion protection...

It is interesting how much the amount of the Calcium additive varies among a sampling of 30 Grades...

Red Line MC 5w30...3205
Mobil 1 5w30 Auto...........2649
Amsoil MC 10w30.....3161
Honda HP4 10w30....1917
HOw old is this 20 years?


5w30 mobil 1 car oil in todays world. Just saw one dated 2018 at 900 ppm calcium.


all those numbers I bet are way off in todays world.
 
I have ran nothing but motul 300v 15w50 in my rc51 since it was new. It has 8500 HARD MILES! Im talking track days and wide open top runs are the norm..... I swear by it. She is dyno tuned 142 rwhp with a hrc ecu with special timing curves and soft rev limiter delete.

Messenger_creation_47E089FB-7A0A-44AF-8926-F04A65F0F866.webp
 
I have ran nothing but motul 300v 15w50 in my rc51 since it was new. It has 8500 HARD MILES! Im talking track days and wide open top runs are the norm..... I swear by it. She is dyno tuned 142 rwhp with a hrc ecu with special timing curves and soft rev limiter delete.

View attachment 316326
Jealous! My dream bike. Getting quite hard to find though, at least up here. Keep it wide-open and enjoy!
 
HOw old is this 20 years?


5w30 mobil 1 car oil in todays world. Just saw one dated 2018 at 900 ppm calcium.


all those numbers I bet are way off in todays world.
Historically this poster sends information forth into the forum that is outdated and antiquated. There's no oil with a modern classification with that much calcium and that low of magnesium. LSPI issues have changed formulations dramatically. It's time to call out the inaccuracy again, it's not helpful nor do I understand why it doesn't get called out by the powers that be on this forum. It's not even in good faith, it's legitimate laziness and lack of desire to be relevant.
 
Historically this poster sends information forth into the forum that is outdated and antiquated. There's no oil with a modern classification with that much calcium and that low of magnesium. LSPI issues have changed formulations dramatically. It's time to call out the inaccuracy again, it's not helpful nor do I understand why it doesn't get called out by the powers that be on this forum. It's not even in good faith, it's legitimate laziness and lack of desire to be relevant.
LSPI is just a fancy phrase for detonation. Its particular to gm because their engines come with blowby and the pcv system puts those fuels and oil into the intake tract. We dealt witi detonation twenty years ago with race engines that were built loose to take the shock of three stages of nitrous on 706 big block engines. My Toyotas dont use a drop of oil between changes, but japanese engines are built tight and right.
 
Back
Top Bottom