Originally Posted by PimTac
I wonder what the ROI time frame is for SirTanon's solar power system? That is the key. If the break even point is close to starting to replace components then the savings are not there.
Isn't 4-5 years considered a good ROI for solar?
Hence my query and hypothetical figures I posted earlier on. Often, solar has been subsidized through feed-in tariffs, which was the case up here, which of course creates a climate of false economics.
We have a 10MW local solar farm that cost 45 million. At the FIT rate given to the facility, which was $0.42/kWh, the payoff of the facility, based on its average output, is 9 years. However, its break-even cost relative to the life of the panels is still above retail rates, let alone wholesale. It required ~$0.25/kWh just to pay for itself during its lifespan, and that doesn't factor in reduced performance due to panel degradation or any maintenance costs. That's not a financially viable project in a real market, it only exists because of ludicrous subsidy.
The same is the case for many of the home installs where even more lucrative rates were provided to home and business owners. None would ever have considered buying the systems if net metering was in place because they would never recoup the cost of their investment over the life of the panels.