Effects of carburated engine on oil, if any

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
397
Location
California
I have the 84 camaro 2.8 V6 auto and its a carburated engine, nice little growl and good torque power it doesnt feel like a wimp honda or little toyota or something
shocked.gif
it feel strong i love it. i ran it i saw startup smoke couldnt tell what it was it did go away oh well it runs pretty good
smile.gif
need to get a gas leak fixed before i see how well it stays runing and temperature and all that.

I chose 10W-30 for it to keep things nice and simple. Never got it fully fully hot yet. anything i need to be aware of that could affect the oil choice or is this fine if all runs well?
 
Originally Posted By: SuperFast
I have the 84 camaro 2.8 V6 auto and its a carburated engine, nice little growl and good torque power it doesnt feel like a wimp honda or little toyota or something
shocked.gif
it feel strong i love it. i ran it i saw startup smoke couldnt tell what it was it did go away oh well it runs pretty good
smile.gif
need to get a gas leak fixed before i see how well it stays runing and temperature and all that.

I chose 10W-30 for it to keep things nice and simple. Never got it fully fully hot yet. anything i need to be aware of that could affect the oil choice or is this fine if all runs well?



If you haven't seen whether it stays running, how do you know it'll outrun a Civic?

I think oil is the least of your concerns at this point.
 
That is a good starting point. If it consumes oil you can move up a bit. If not, stay with it. I think it is a flat tappet valve train, so check out my oil paper for recommendations.
 
In general, engines with carbs pollute more and as a result oil gets dirty faster and become more diluted by fuel. As a result, engines don't last as long, fuel economy suffers, etc. You didn't think all current vehicle engines went to fuel injection just for fun, did you?
 
My old '84 S-10 truck w/ a carbd 2.8 is sitting outside my shop without a tag and registration and has 309,000 miles on it. First rebuild was in '93 at 154,000.

During the last 80,000 miles that it was on the road (I used to drive 85 miles a day round trip to work) I fed it nothing but Super Tech 5w30 synthetic (SL & SM) and did 6,000 mile OCI. No valve train trouble with SL or SM, so I don't think a 'special oil' or an HDEO is warranted. It does smoke a little when cold but after things get to temp the smoking stops (Valve seals I'm assuming.)

I think the 10w30 in your case is defenitely a good choice, that's what was the recomended factory weight. I think GM might have recommend 10w40 in summer in certain climates but I'm not 100% on that.

The 2.8 has been a pretty relaible engine for me, not a powerhouse though by any means. It also knocked down respectable MPG, I think I was getting 22-24mpg with summer fuel.
 
Pontential fuel dilution is a problem with carbed engines. The older engines, early 80's and older, didn't have positive seal valve seals so they can sometimes burn more oil when they're old.

Hey genynnc, I just noticed in your signature you have some of my favorite models, '55 Chevy and a '67 Chevelle, pretty cool.
 
My 2.8 experienced showed me that its a wimpy engine. Had one in my S-10. Pretty sure a Honda Civic or Corolla would run away and hide from that truck. About the only thing quick I ever saw with a 2.8 was my sisters Fiero.

I always used Castrol GTX in my 2.8. 10w30 and it didnt burn oil at all.
 
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
Originally Posted By: SuperFast
I have the 84 camaro 2.8 V6 auto and its a carburated engine, nice little growl and good torque power it doesnt feel like a wimp honda or little toyota or something
shocked.gif
it feel strong i love it. i ran it i saw startup smoke couldnt tell what it was it did go away oh well it runs pretty good
smile.gif
need to get a gas leak fixed before i see how well it stays runing and temperature and all that.

I chose 10W-30 for it to keep things nice and simple. Never got it fully fully hot yet. anything i need to be aware of that could affect the oil choice or is this fine if all runs well?



If you haven't seen whether it stays running, how do you know it'll outrun a Civic?

I think oil is the least of your concerns at this point.


the one i bought needs some work but it drives real nice i feel torque from it and im not going to be racing 'anything with wheels' as the previous 24 year old owner did. And i had some civics and they did not have as much torque as my car
smile.gif
provable fact thank you. Im not racing the car thats stupid itr just looks fast ok.

If your Prius had a corvette engine it could walk my car like it was on a leash then break the leash. Otherwise, no
 
Fuel dilution is a serious consideration for carburated engines. I remember changing oil in carburated engines. The oil always came out thinner than what I put in there. Not so with fuel injected engines.
 
"SuperFast" & "84 Camaro 2.8 V6 auto" is a serious contradiction in terms...
 
Originally Posted By: TFB1
"SuperFast" & "84 Camaro 2.8 V6 auto" is a serious contradiction in terms...


350SBC converted Camaros are superfast
smile.gif
 
I put a lot of 383 stroker motors in the old 80's Camaros and Firebirds. I know they make a nice platform for a doorslammer drag car for those on budgets.

Not all 350's are fast. Just think about this, the "High Output" 305 with the electronic quadrajet that came from the factory in my 86 Monte SS put out a whopping 190hp. My 2.4 liter (half the displacement) Scion TC puts our almost 170 with a lot less weight. Im glad I ditched that 305 and 200R4 trans for a 406 SBC and TH350 trans.
 
I think carbed engines have more fuel dilution than fi engines,so shorter ocis would be better.
 
Originally Posted By: Robenstein
I put a lot of 383 stroker motors in the old 80's Camaros and Firebirds. I know they make a nice platform for a doorslammer drag car for those on budgets.

Not all 350's are fast. Just think about this, the "High Output" 305 with the electronic quadrajet that came from the factory in my 86 Monte SS put out a whopping 190hp. My 2.4 liter (half the displacement) Scion TC puts our almost 170 with a lot less weight. Im glad I ditched that 305 and 200R4 trans for a 406 SBC and TH350 trans.



You are saying 305. are you saying 305 was a 350cubic inch engine? and the "307" (?) V8 from a 1982 delta 88 was not a fast engine, but a mighty powerful one. please confirm 1982 delta 88 had 307cubic inch V8

also heard of a "396" engine. other nice engine/trans to drop in this car? it has a 700R4 at this time. i just put some seal-up in the radiator ran for 25 mins let it sit long time it runs better and no more whispy smoke or steam so i see improvement and i went with 10W30 i didnt go thicker unless i should ?
 
Originally Posted By: SuperFast
Originally Posted By: Robenstein
I put a lot of 383 stroker motors in the old 80's Camaros and Firebirds. I know they make a nice platform for a doorslammer drag car for those on budgets.

Not all 350's are fast. Just think about this, the "High Output" 305 with the electronic quadrajet that came from the factory in my 86 Monte SS put out a whopping 190hp. My 2.4 liter (half the displacement) Scion TC puts our almost 170 with a lot less weight. Im glad I ditched that 305 and 200R4 trans for a 406 SBC and TH350 trans.



You are saying 305. are you saying 305 was a 350cubic inch engine? and the "307" (?) V8 from a 1982 delta 88 was not a fast engine, but a mighty powerful one. please confirm 1982 delta 88 had 307cubic inch V8

also heard of a "396" engine. other nice engine/trans to drop in this car? it has a 700R4 at this time. i just put some seal-up in the radiator ran for 25 mins let it sit long time it runs better and no more whispy smoke or steam so i see improvement and i went with 10W30 i didnt go thicker unless i should ?



you have alot to learn about sbc and bbc.
putting a bbc in a 3rd gen requires a 500 dollar pair of headers and a motor mount adapter set. i know your planning on running headers otherwise the statement is...
the stock 396 was junk, the heads had so much valveshroud they didnt flow anything. if you want a bbc i would go with a 454 or 427. if you can find a buildable core..
for you i recommend a sbc with 100 dollar set of headmans and y-pipe. dont get too big on the cam and look for some decent heads. get a 700r4 from an 87 or newer 3rd gen because they are stronger and have it built with red altos and a corvet servo. putting a planetary gear out of a 4l60 e would help as well. then you need to spend a grand to build the rear end because its junk 7.5 without posi and high gears....

or you could get a 5.0 and call it done..



and im shocked that someone had a 190 hp 305!! my 82 with 200r had 160 hp rating. it was a dog!!!!! went with a 440 hp 350 and th350 w/ 3500 stall and 410s. 7.80s eighth mile. but that was when i was single and no kids. i drive a fuel injected flybywire pos now and i hate it. throttle response, whats that??
 
Originally Posted By: electrolover
Originally Posted By: SuperFast
Originally Posted By: Robenstein
I put a lot of 383 stroker motors in the old 80's Camaros and Firebirds. I know they make a nice platform for a doorslammer drag car for those on budgets.

Not all 350's are fast. Just think about this, the "High Output" 305 with the electronic quadrajet that came from the factory in my 86 Monte SS put out a whopping 190hp. My 2.4 liter (half the displacement) Scion TC puts our almost 170 with a lot less weight. Im glad I ditched that 305 and 200R4 trans for a 406 SBC and TH350 trans.



You are saying 305. are you saying 305 was a 350cubic inch engine? and the "307" (?) V8 from a 1982 delta 88 was not a fast engine, but a mighty powerful one. please confirm 1982 delta 88 had 307cubic inch V8

also heard of a "396" engine. other nice engine/trans to drop in this car? it has a 700R4 at this time. i just put some seal-up in the radiator ran for 25 mins let it sit long time it runs better and no more whispy smoke or steam so i see improvement and i went with 10W30 i didnt go thicker unless i should ?



you have alot to learn about sbc and bbc.
putting a bbc in a 3rd gen requires a 500 dollar pair of headers and a motor mount adapter set. i know your planning on running headers otherwise the statement is...
the stock 396 was junk, the heads had so much valveshroud they didnt flow anything. if you want a bbc i would go with a 454 or 427. if you can find a buildable core..
for you i recommend a sbc with 100 dollar set of headmans and y-pipe. dont get too big on the cam and look for some decent heads. get a 700r4 from an 87 or newer 3rd gen because they are stronger and have it built with red altos and a corvet servo. putting a planetary gear out of a 4l60 e would help as well. then you need to spend a grand to build the rear end because its junk 7.5 without posi and high gears....

or you could get a 5.0 and call it done..



and im shocked that someone had a 190 hp 305!! my 82 with 200r had 160 hp rating. it was a dog!!!!! went with a 440 hp 350 and th350 w/ 3500 stall and 410s. 7.80s eighth mile. but that was when i was single and no kids. i drive a fuel injected flybywire pos now and i hate it. throttle response, whats that??

Not for nothing but...

1982%20Oldsmobile%20Delta%2088_02.jpg


1982 Olds Delta 88, 5.0L 307

http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2586977720100919974DDvgMm

"For 1980, all 88s got new and more aerodynamic sheetmetal for improved fuel economy highlighted by rounded square taillights similar to mid-70s 88s, but overall dimensions stayed the same and coupes received a revised roofline. New to the engine lineup was the 307 cubic-inch Rocket V8 with four-barrel carburetor and 150 horsepower (110 kW). All other engines except the now-discontinued 403 were carried over from 1979." wiki

what can fit in camaro third gen ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom