OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
It's a discussion forum, we don't get to silo what we say in different threads, Fred.Where is the website guide that tell us that's how it works here? I see mixing threads as a bigger issue.
You not understanding the sequences is leading you to interpret my position as one that isn't following what somebody you are loosely quoting, from a video, is saying.Again you didn't pay attention, was that test for the field "issue" like what the guy said, or just one more test because of a new technology (e.g. start stop)?
What where the field issues that where not being tested directly before? We can ask that guy. But also a document that does not seek evidence to disproof itself leaves little room to be trusted. Or, there has never been any field ""issues"" before? There has been (I assume) and they have not be directly tested.
There's a reason I specifically mentioned Sequence IVA, because it's designed to replicate the conditions where increased wear takes place during short-tripping operation, which was a broadly observed in-field issue and subsequently addressed. This is right along the same lines as LSPI, where an issue observed in service wasn't isolated to any particular marque, but rather was conditions dependant, which led to a specific test being developed.
As I said, read through the sequences.
But both are your interpretation of what constitutes adequacy, so it is in fact germane.Again, let's continue it there, but I have no issue backtracking from what I perceived or expressed. This thread is on a separate issue. I will not repeat that.
You realize this doesn't make sense, right? This thread is predicated on the premise that the API/ILSAC approvals aren't sufficient, which is specific to lubricant-related durability. You've now stated that you have no examples of this actually being an issue, but lament that this somehow, tangentially, didn't influence general reliability? If these observations that you allude to about durability have no relation to lubrication, then how, prey tell, does that statement in any way tie-in to your conclusion that the API/ILSAC sequences are inadequate?I don't have examples, and was talking about their general reliability.
I'll save your fingers the workout: It doesn't, this is a fantastic and totally irrelevant detour; it's whataboutism.