Do you use radar/laser detectors?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
speeding (and having a need for a radar detector) is immature, selfish and dangerous. period.

that said, i owned one back in the 90's when they actually worked and were useful and drove over the speed limit because i was immature, selfish, and dangerous.


Hey! I resemble that remark- and I'm 56!!!

thumbsup2.gif
19.gif
 
Immature? Selfish?

How many people do you see these days who aren't, especially behind the wheel of a car? If we actually knew how to drive there would be little need for speed limits. I say "we" because if one driver on the highway is bad it's bad for us all.

Don't want to beat this dead horse anymore, though.
 
A certain percentage of speeders on the road is a good thing.

My favorite example is when the road after a lane closure zone is completely open. People still take forever to get back up to speed, at least around here. It keeps the back-up going a lot longer than it has to. If the people in front would nail their throttles once road opened up (conditions permitting), the people behind would have a much easier time.

In that kind of situation, what's more immature and selfish: returning to a good speed as soon as possible, or making everyone else wait so you don't have to feel rushed?
 
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
I say "we" because if one driver on the highway is bad it's bad for us all.


This is the saddest truth of all. One poor driver on a crowded road can inhibit traffic for many many drivers in a variety of ways.

Lowest common denominator...
 
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
speeding (and having a need for a radar detector) is immature, selfish and dangerous. period.

that said, i owned one back in the 90's when they actually worked and were useful and drove over the speed limit because i was immature, selfish, and dangerous.


Does that mean that owning a gun makes you a blood thirsty murderer?

You obviously own it for one of two reasons:

You're a hunter, and want to kill animals, hence you're blood thirsty.
Or, you are looking for that one day when you cross paths with someone who makes you want to put a couple of rounds in their chest for whatever reason.

Maybe you need to give up your guns since you're a blood thirsty, irresponsible gun owner, waiting for a chance to kill someone.

Same logic as you provided, but a different tool.

BC.
 
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
speeding (and having a need for a radar detector) is immature, selfish and dangerous. period.


01.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Bladecutter
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
speeding (and having a need for a radar detector) is immature, selfish and dangerous. period.

that said, i owned one back in the 90's when they actually worked and were useful and drove over the speed limit because i was immature, selfish, and dangerous.


Does that mean that owning a gun makes you a blood thirsty murderer?

You obviously own it for one of two reasons:

You're a hunter, and want to kill animals, hence you're blood thirsty.
Or, you are looking for that one day when you cross paths with someone who makes you want to put a couple of rounds in their chest for whatever reason.

Maybe you need to give up your guns since you're a blood thirsty, irresponsible gun owner, waiting for a chance to kill someone.

Same logic as you provided, but a different tool.

BC.


I am afraid your analogy is flawed.

You can own/use a gun for many legal reasons. A radar detector however has one use - to help a driver not get caught speeding which is breaking the law. Actually having a radar detector in your vehicle in and of itself is illegal in many states so it is a double whammy.

There is only one reason to have a radar detector in your vehicle and it isn't for something legal. So your analogy to gun ownership does not work.
 
Radar detectors are only illegal in VA and DC in the US for all vehicles, the rest of the country they are legal for vehicles under 10,000 lbs.
 
Originally Posted By: Nederlander75
Fear and condemnation of speeding is most likely a symptom of poor driving ability and erectile dysfunction.


Wow! That's quite a leap in logic. Poor driving ability is endemic. I have not yet been able to do anything except complain about it.
 
LOL! I just remembered that, in the 80's, one of my best friends referred to a radar detector as a "testicular enhancement device."

We are Americans. Questioning authority is our birthright.
 
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI


I am afraid your analogy is flawed.

You can own/use a gun for many legal reasons. A radar detector however has one use - to help a driver not get caught speeding which is breaking the law. Actually having a radar detector in your vehicle in and of itself is illegal in many states so it is a double whammy.

There is only one reason to have a radar detector in your vehicle and it isn't for something legal. So your analogy to gun ownership does not work.


The only one with flawed logic in these two posts, unfortunately, is you.

There is only 1 state with a law on the books that makes having a radar detector in operation in your vehicle an illegal act. Possessing it isn't illegal, however, otherwise that one state would have barriers at their state borders to pull over a large number of drivers passing through their state.

One state where the use of a radar detector is illegal does not make a lot of states, so, that negates your statement about radar detectors, in full.

Also, guns were make with one purpose:

To kill things.
Animals, humans, invading aliens.
It does nothing else at all.

You can use it for target shooting, but that is not what it was invented for.

Aside from killing living things, and putting holes in targets, exactly what other purpose does a gun serve? None.

Guns were also an advancement of technology.

Swords and spears came first.
Then someone started throwing swords and spears, so decided to invent a way to make them fly through the air at a much greater speed. That lead to the invention of bows and arrows.

Bows and arrows eventually lead to guns after the invention of gun powder.
What was the purpose of Bows and Arrows? Killing living things.
Oddly enough, they can also be used for putting holes in targets, and require much more skill to use properly.

Besides, I can drive around all day long with the cruise control locked in at the speed limit, and all it takes is one dishonest speed trap at the bottom of a slight hill, or a dishonest revenue generator to pull me over and hand me a ticket. Luckily, those types of people in that profession are few and far between.

The main thing I can take from this entire topic is the fact that I'm glad that people like you and cptbarkey can't take away my right to own and operate my perfectly legal, and very useful, anti-speeding ticket device.

BC.
 
[
[ BUT your trained driver's eye can usually tell when a Crown Victoria is off to the side of the road, as there is some sort of clearing for him to pull out and get you.

Man! talk about slow travel! Back in the 55mph days I was sometimes given a white Chevy full size sedan to drive. I think it was a Caprice. I worked for an obscure government agency. Had the seal of the obscure government agency on the side and on a sunny day out west I would wear aviator sunglasses. 53 mph for two straight hours.....
 
1. Speed is not risky in and of itself. What's risky is moving through traffic with too much of a speed differential, driving too close to the limit of your reflexes and your car's abilities, and so on -- all of which is covered by the term "reckless driving." The term "speeding" is completely unnecessary.

2. Among all of the factors related to dangerous driving, speed is the only one we can use machines to put a number on. That is the only reason it gets targeted for enforcement.

3. Not everyone drives a lumbering SUV, rusty old beater, or chintzy econobox. Some of us drive cars that are safe at double or triple any posted speed limit.

4. As SteveSRT8 said, posted speed limits are usually -- and intentionally -- MUCH lower than appropriate. There are actually well-tested methods for setting speed limits, which most counties completely ignore.

5. There have been multiple studies suggesting that if everyone on the road obeyed all of the rules perfectly, traffic would be catastrophic. Having a certain percentage of rule breakers very often keeps things moving better than they otherwise would.

6. Even for people who are highly interested in obeying the speed limit, a radar detector can be a great tool on a long trip. Speed signs and speed traps are fairly often placed near high-risk areas, so hearing that warning go off can be a reminder to be extra vigilant.



This is why I feel perfectly comfortable doing the following:

A. Speeding.
B. Using my radar detector.
C. Ignoring the sanctimonious rants of people who seem to think they're better than I because they drive slowly.
 
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
1. Speed is not risky in and of itself. What's risky is moving through traffic with too much of a speed differential, driving too close to the limit of your reflexes and your car's abilities, and so on -- all of which is covered by the term "reckless driving." The term "speeding" is completely unnecessary.

2. Among all of the factors related to dangerous driving, speed is the only one we can use machines to put a number on. That is the only reason it gets targeted for enforcement.

3. Not everyone drives a lumbering SUV, rusty old beater, or chintzy econobox. Some of us drive cars that are safe at double or triple any posted speed limit.

4. As SteveSRT8 said, posted speed limits are usually -- and intentionally -- MUCH lower than appropriate. There are actually well-tested methods for setting speed limits, which most counties completely ignore.

5. There have been multiple studies suggesting that if everyone on the road obeyed all of the rules perfectly, traffic would be catastrophic. Having a certain percentage of rule breakers very often keeps things moving better than they otherwise would.

6. Even for people who are highly interested in obeying the speed limit, a radar detector can be a great tool on a long trip. Speed signs and speed traps are fairly often placed near high-risk areas, so hearing that warning go off can be a reminder to be extra vigilant.



This is why I feel perfectly comfortable doing the following:

A. Speeding.
B. Using my radar detector.
C. Ignoring the sanctimonious rants of people who seem to think they're better than I because they drive slowly.


I agree 100%
 
Originally Posted By: Bladecutter
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI


I am afraid your analogy is flawed.

You can own/use a gun for many legal reasons. A radar detector however has one use - to help a driver not get caught speeding which is breaking the law. Actually having a radar detector in your vehicle in and of itself is illegal in many states so it is a double whammy.

There is only one reason to have a radar detector in your vehicle and it isn't for something legal. So your analogy to gun ownership does not work.


The only one with flawed logic in these two posts, unfortunately, is you.

There is only 1 state with a law on the books that makes having a radar detector in operation in your vehicle an illegal act. Possessing it isn't illegal, however, otherwise that one state would have barriers at their state borders to pull over a large number of drivers passing through their state.

One state where the use of a radar detector is illegal does not make a lot of states, so, that negates your statement about radar detectors, in full.

Also, guns were make with one purpose:

To kill things.
Animals, humans, invading aliens.
It does nothing else at all.

You can use it for target shooting, but that is not what it was invented for.

Aside from killing living things, and putting holes in targets, exactly what other purpose does a gun serve? None.

Guns were also an advancement of technology.

Swords and spears came first.
Then someone started throwing swords and spears, so decided to invent a way to make them fly through the air at a much greater speed. That lead to the invention of bows and arrows.

Bows and arrows eventually lead to guns after the invention of gun powder.
What was the purpose of Bows and Arrows? Killing living things.
Oddly enough, they can also be used for putting holes in targets, and require much more skill to use properly.

Besides, I can drive around all day long with the cruise control locked in at the speed limit, and all it takes is one dishonest speed trap at the bottom of a slight hill, or a dishonest revenue generator to pull me over and hand me a ticket. Luckily, those types of people in that profession are few and far between.

The main thing I can take from this entire topic is the fact that I'm glad that people like you and cptbarkey can't take away my right to own and operate my perfectly legal, and very useful, anti-speeding ticket device.

BC.


There is nothing wrong with my logic.

1st of I said "some states" not all as I didn't have a list right in front of me to know an exact numbers of what was illegal where. Obviously when I said having it in your vehicle I was refering to actually using it. What other reason would there be to have it in the vehicle? Give me a break ok. I didn't mean "the man" was going to pull you over and confiscate your car just because you had a radar detector in it. Wow. I am talking about using it obviously. It is like here in NH. Fireworks are illegal to shoot off( without a permit )but you can still walk into a store and buy them. You aren't illegal until you light them up. Same applies to what I said( meant )on detectors.

Also, for the record, according to what I can find online...

Radar Detectors are illegal in...
  • Virginia
  • Washington DC
  • Any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds in any state( federal law )


Laser Jammers are illegal in...

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Illinois
  • Minnesota
  • Oklahoma
  • South Carolina
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Virginia


If you are going down the road with your CC locked in at the speed limit, as you say, how does a radar detector( or laser jammer )help you avoid that dishonest officer/speed trap in your scenario? Even if you go down that "slight hill" you won't increase speed enough to get a ticket if you were locked in at the speed limit as you claim. IF you get a ticket you would get it wiith or without the detector/jammer. Talk about some flawed logic.
grin.gif


Ah, MANY MANY guns are intended for target shooting. Built specifically for that purpose. Not for hunting or self defense but specifically for target shooting. Do a search for competitive shooting and you wiill see what I mean. Those guns are not suited to hunting or self defense.

The difference between guns and detectors/jammers in your argument here is the guns are for legal to use purposes whereas a detector/jammer is for ONE purpose and ONE purpose alone and that is to avoid a speeding ticket. If you need the detector/jammer for that then it means you were speeding in the 1st place which is an illegal act. The detecors/jammers may be legal to use in "most" states/areas but the reason you use it is to avoid a ticket for an illegal act. I can go hunting, or target shooting, or even defend myself with my guns and I am legal from ownership of the firearm to using it.

All I am saying.

The main thing I take away from this thread is that BITOG is full of people with lead feet, who think any kind of law designed for safety is some kind of monitary grab, and who are paranoid of "the man".

As I said in my initial response don't speed and you don't need to worry about a ticket and thus your detectors/jammers are not needed. Very simple. If you feel you must have one then clearly you speed and break the law. I don't agree wiith every law on the books myself but they are what they are and you follow them or change them.

This thread is too funny.
crackmeup2.gif
 
Last edited:
The FCC clearly states that we have the right to receive signals broadcast into the public domain. That is LEGAL.

As long as a Radar Detector is passive and receives only then it technically qualifies.

There are readily available studies online that show people with radar detectors are more likely to be paying attention, thus they may be even BETTER drivers than those who are just a-cruisin'.

There are also many studies that conclusively prove that SPEED is nothing but a contributor to the severity of an accident. It rarely is the cause.
 
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
The main thing I take away from this thread is that BITOG is full of people with lead feet, who think any kind of law designed for safety is some kind of monitary grab, and who are paranoid of "the man".

Really?

You should read the thread, then.
 
States/Municipalities and the insurance industry love speed limits set below the 85th percentile. The more motorists ticketed, the more revenue- and the insurance companies can rais the rates of those hapless drivers even though there is no evidence that a couple of speeding tickets increases the loss exposure of the company. A friend of mine in the KY General Assembly once asked an insurance industry official to produce any proof that a driver with a few speeding tickets is more likely to be involved in an accident. He never received a response.
 
OP, great topic! I have heard just about all of these arguments before - long before we all had computers and the ability to openly discuss the topic with people all over the country.

I'll state my main points that I think are relevant to this thread.

Most drivers in the U.S., not all, are inattentive, selfish, and have poorly developed skills.

Speed enforcement is arbitrary and an ineffective tool for improving safety.

Revenue may not be the goal of speed enforcement, but it sure is a nice side effect for municipalities that actually put citation revenues into their annual budgets.

If speed limits were properly determined and set there would be far fewer "speeders."

Some people are going to drive like, as George Carlin put it, "idiots and maniacs" no matter what.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom