Do Piston Rings Rotate in their grooves whilst the engine's running? At approximately how many RPM?

If they didn't rotate some, I think they would wear out faster. There is some side loading of pistons in a V engine or even more in a horizontally opposed engine like a Porsche, VW, or Subaru.
 
Sometimes someone will post that an engine suddenly used oil. Then mysteriously quit using oil. Did the rings line up for a while?
Could be, that scenario is somewhat common with GA aircraft engines. I've experienced it on aircraft that I've owned, some more so than others.

I would guess that the rotation also helps prevent the rings from sticking in their grooves, losing the tension against the cylinder walls.
 
The way I understand it they are all over the place CW/CCW, faster and slower and a more aggressive cylinder crosshatch pattern can increase the movement.
I suppose that will result in very even wear and ring width should be very consistent over the lifespan of the rings.
 
They rotate all the time. In fact, if they're not rotating, that's indication of stuck rings and/or really poor cylinder surface. I've torn apart several engines that I've built, after being run, and the rings are never where I set them. It doesn't matter the type of hone, ring thickness or tension, or piston to wall clearance. Doesn't matter if the top ring is .100" down or .350" down, if it's barrel faced or napier cut, reverse twist, etc.... they all rotate.
 
I read that paper a long time ago, they used radiotracer technique to observe rotation.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44548521


They did! When the British Leyland A Series A+ engine was designed, they irradiated the piston rings and then took samples of the engine oil to determine the wear rate. When I was a school science tech, I had a poster behind my desk detailing this.
I'd forgotten the technique they used to determine the rate of rotation. I wasn't expecting much response to my post, so thank you all.
 
In the early eighties' all of my family lost their jobs within a few weeks. We opened a car repair business and did quite a few engine rebuilds. Older low value cars were, if not too worn, fitted with AE Hepolite oil control piston ring sets. The top ring had a 'ridge-dodger' profile to clear the cylinder bore's unworn portion. Many other brands had a similar product.
They worked very well. Compression test figure
What proof do you have?
https://www.partinfo.co.uk/articles/292

Not case closed 'proof' by any means. I'll look at my notes & bookmarks tomorrow evening. I've spent the last four hours struggling to remove a single Tork bolt from BMW E36 starter motor. Now I know why I've been putting the job off since 2020 :-) Thanks for all of your replies.
 
In the early eighties' all of my family lost their jobs within a few weeks. We opened a car repair business and did quite a few engine rebuilds. Older low value cars were, if not too worn, fitted with AE Hepolite oil control piston ring sets. The top ring had a 'ridge-dodger' profile to clear the cylinder bore's unworn portion. Many other brands had a similar product.
They worked very well. Compression test figure

https://www.partinfo.co.uk/articles/292

Not case closed 'proof' by any means. I'll look at my notes & bookmarks tomorrow evening. I've spent the last four hours struggling to remove a single Tork bolt from BMW E36 starter motor. Now I know why I've been putting the job off since 2020 :) Thanks for all of your replies.
Sorry, the link is in the title. Also the YouTube video posted by anther member, earlier.
 
I have observed movement in engines I have built as well. My standard ring installation pattern is always: Oil ring gap towards camshaft, top ring to rear of engine parallel to the piston pin, 2nd ring to front of engine parallel to the piston pin. When I have gone back into engines I have rebuilt, ring orientation is not the same. I can't say how many revolutions were made, what direction etc. of course, but they definitely moved. I have sometimes wondered if it even matters how I put it together given they move... 🤷‍♂️ but it is still good practice to offset the gaps in my opinion and I always will.
 
But why do they rotate?
My guess would be the combined effect of the cyclic gas
A piston on the power stroke will compress the ring unevenly owing to the effect of the thrust side causing a ring to naturally rotate as the ring's gap is nearly always at an offset angle to the thrust?
Cross hatching, gas cycling forces and possibly vibration too?
I've a old Honda 50cc piston and if I repeatedly compress and very slightly release the piston rings with a simple ring compressor tool, it has a tendency to gradually progress the ring around the groove. It takes around ten cycles to visibly move the ring.
 
Last edited:
Many years ago when Cadillac switched to robotic assembly of engines the robots were designed with software that put all of the gaps in the piston rings aligned. The result was that a batch of engines was produced with the gaps all aligned that had very high oil consumption. It was so bad that Cadillac had to do a recall and the fix was that the tecks at the dealers had to take the engines apart and rotate the rings on all the Pistons so that none of the gaps aligned. Imagine having to rip an engine down just to access the Rings to change the positioning of the gaps. But that is what they had to do. Of course they change the software from then on so that whenever robots assembled the engines the gaps in the piston rings were no longer aligned. So I guess the Rings don't really rotate that much because if they did the problem would have gone away without having to rip the engines apart and redo the positioning, and it didn't.
slightly off topic here- but some big mining companies in Australia decided to sack their truck drivers and run driverless trucks - with in a few weeks there was deep ruts in the dirt mining roads and enormous problems when the rains came - the good old human drivers "wandered" over the road way and kept the whole road compacted evenly. the stupid AI dimwits ran all trucks on exactly the same track and destroyed the roads, especially for the other smaller vehicles running around the minesite. such stupidity going to robotics en masse and depriving kids of good old simple jobs manufacturing and driving. such managerial arrogance is the death of a good living for many people.
 
Back
Top Bottom