As the title and if they do, what average RPM?
I would expect piston rings to move fractionally sideways in both directions but I cannot see them developing consistent rotation.
Does the width of a piston ring change relatively evenly over its lifespan?I thought, with little evidence, that the whole notion if ring “seating” was to wear away small amount of ring and cylinder wall metals to create a near-perfect seal at each point. Any rotation would compromise this seal.
The speed of rotation of piston rings has been measured experimentally. Shaw and Nussdorfer (2) examined the phenomenon on a large engine and found that, at 1000 rpm engine speed, the piston rings were “observed to rotate as rapidly as 1 rpm”
Correct, they do indeed rotate. In most conventional engines at a rate of around 4-8RPM. The Cadillac story is interesting btw. My source is Modern Engine Technology, Heinz Heisler. A truly excellent 300+ page read, available on eBay for under $10 from time to time. The actual rate of rotation took some time to find and was from an SAE paper, when I had access to them. Thanks for the replies and interest.Yes they rotate.
I would suggest the alignment of the rings created a raised ridge, effectively pegging the rings?Many years ago when Cadillac switched to robotic assembly of engines the robots were designed with software that put all of the gaps in the piston rings aligned. The result was that a batch of engines was produced with the gaps all aligned that had very high oil consumption. It was so bad that Cadillac had to do a recall and the fix was that the tecks at the dealers had to take the engines apart and rotate the rings on all the Pistons so that none of the gaps aligned. Imagine having to rip an engine down just to access the Rings to change the positioning of the gaps. But that is what they had to do. Of course they change the software from then on so that whenever robots assembled the engines the gaps in the piston rings were no longer aligned. So I guess the Rings don't really rotate that much because if they did the problem would have gone away without having to rip the engines apart and redo the positioning, and it didn't.
I read that paper a long time ago, they used radiotracer technique to observe rotation.Correct, they do indeed rotate. In most conventional engines at a rate of around 4-8RPM. The Cadillac story is interesting btw. My source is Modern Engine Technology, Heinz Heisler. A truly excellent 300+ page read, available on eBay for under $10 from time to time. The actual rate of rotation took some time to find and was from an SAE paper, when I had access to them. Thanks for the replies and interest.
Tell that to the diagonal crosshatch that’s sliding across the rings at a couple thousand feet per minute. To rotate 8-10’ over 3-4000 feet traveled is nothing.No way the rings in a car are rotating at up to 8 rpm.
That is quite possible, if the ring lands get varnish and carbon it can cause sticking of one or all of the rings.Sometimes someone will post that an engine suddenly used oil. Then mysteriously quit using oil. Did the rings line up for a while?