Snap on better up their game if they want to keep selling their tools as if they were made from precious metals. In reality they are loosing ground to Taiwan made tools. Now Capri and Icon both proved to be better at almost a third the price. TTC did not give points for the best warranty.
Meh, the tools were "better" only by some of the measures of this particular test.
Pros will place a premium on the small heads and low backdrag more than the brute force strength. Because pros don't abuse tools, they rarely break them and don't need the strongest possible tool to offset the foolishness of the user.
There's a trend lately to dumb down tool testing into brute strength. A dumbing down is exactly what it is.
A 17mm bolt head is (as tested in the video) commonly used on M12 fasteners on Japanese-brand cars (Honda, Toyota). The torque spec for an M12 varies from 39 to 125Nm for a class 10.9 (roughly the same as Grade 8).
Which means the "100% of ASME" reference of 267Nm for a 17mm is OVER DOUBLE the torque of a common high-grade M12 fastener.
The Snap On wrench tested in the video is only 277mm total length. Where you put your hand, you have about 250mm length. Which means to even approach the "100% of ASME" point in the video, you'd have to be pulling or pushing with 963N of force. Or about TWO HUNDRED SIXTEEN POUNDS. Now, you might have much stronger, tougher hands that I do, but I assure you there's no way on earth I'm going to be applying over 200# to the end of a Snap-on wrench. Very few (i.e. zero) humans are capable of applying enough force to the wrench to approach its limits.
Which means that only way you can even get close to breaking a tool at the 100% ASME point is by using a special test machine (as they do here with "pushy") or by using a cheater pipe and of course that is abusing the tool.
Since literally every wrench in their test is absolutely sufficiently strong for use *by hand*, then strength is not a useful discriminator among the tools. What is? Size and smoothness. Which is where the Snap-on excels.
I personally own a single snap-on tool (inherited) and will never buy them. They are way too expensive when so many also-excellent options exist.
But let's not make the "Test" findings into something they aren't. The snap-on tools are excellent and reflect the mature understanding of professionals that there's more to performance than brute strength.
I've wrenched hundreds and hundred (perhaps thousands) of hours over 35+ years of wrenching. Just because I don't buy snap-on doesn't mean I can't see why so many pros love them. They are excellent, truly professional tools.