Hi,
I drive a 2017 Honda Civic, and the time has come to replace my current snow tires. I currently have 15" rims and will be replacing the tires with 195/65R15 tires again. Coming off are a set of studded Goodyear Ultra Grip Winter. Ice performance has been excellent, but last winter they made me feel a little unsettled in snow, and showing some signs of dry rot.
I live on the east coast of Canada, and my driving in the winter is about half highway driving, and half poorly-cleared urban commuting.
Winters are very unpredictable, with lots of slush and ice, plenty of snowfall but little accumulation.
I'm currently considering the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Studded, Michelin X-Ice North 4 Studded or Firestone Winterforce 2 (would also stud these). There are no regulations for studded tires in the winter in our urban areas, therefore I'd like to go with studded tires for the extra safety on ice.
I can get the Nokians for $863, the Michelins for $691, or the Firestones for $574.
I know the firestones will react well in slush and snow, but I'm not so sure about the ice and dry performance. I'd assume that since they are studded, the ice performance will still be better than studless Blizzaks or X-Ice, along with improved treadwear.
Equally, I know the Nokians and Michelins are excellent in icy conditions, but I'm wondering if they would perform as well as the Firestones in wet or slushy conditions.
So, how do the Hakkapeliittas or X-Ice North 4 perform in slush and rain, and are they worth the premium over the Firestones? Any other suggestions for studded tires in these conditions?
I drive a 2017 Honda Civic, and the time has come to replace my current snow tires. I currently have 15" rims and will be replacing the tires with 195/65R15 tires again. Coming off are a set of studded Goodyear Ultra Grip Winter. Ice performance has been excellent, but last winter they made me feel a little unsettled in snow, and showing some signs of dry rot.
I live on the east coast of Canada, and my driving in the winter is about half highway driving, and half poorly-cleared urban commuting.
Winters are very unpredictable, with lots of slush and ice, plenty of snowfall but little accumulation.
I'm currently considering the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Studded, Michelin X-Ice North 4 Studded or Firestone Winterforce 2 (would also stud these). There are no regulations for studded tires in the winter in our urban areas, therefore I'd like to go with studded tires for the extra safety on ice.
I can get the Nokians for $863, the Michelins for $691, or the Firestones for $574.
I know the firestones will react well in slush and snow, but I'm not so sure about the ice and dry performance. I'd assume that since they are studded, the ice performance will still be better than studless Blizzaks or X-Ice, along with improved treadwear.
Equally, I know the Nokians and Michelins are excellent in icy conditions, but I'm wondering if they would perform as well as the Firestones in wet or slushy conditions.
So, how do the Hakkapeliittas or X-Ice North 4 perform in slush and rain, and are they worth the premium over the Firestones? Any other suggestions for studded tires in these conditions?