Best 0w20 to resist fuel dilution in Honda 1.5 TGDI engine? And use in Honda J35 V6s?

Status
Not open for further replies.
My Mazda SkyActiv 2.5 is 13:1. The newer Toyota engines with similar technology are up there as well.
Quite the higher than mine. Wonder if there are any advantages to it but also some negatives.
 
So I did some reading just now in a couple places on the net and it said that engines with higher compression ratio require gasoline with higher octane. But it didn't say at what ratio.
 
Personally I would run a 0w30 and no more than 5k mile changes. We ran 20 weight in my wife's 1.5l t Civic and even at 5k intervals it reeked of fuel when I changed it, not short tripped, 30 mile commutes.
Whatever you decide, change it often and it will last
 
So I did some reading just now in a couple places on the net and it said that engines with higher compression ratio require gasoline with higher octane. But it didn't say at what ratio.
Yes, that's traditionally been the case. For example, my 6.4L is 10.9:1, and calls for a minimum of 91. It pings BADLY on regular (I got a tank at a station that was supposed to be 91 and had to dilute it with 94 to get the pinging to stop). It is of course port-injected.

DI engines, because they can control when and how much fuel they deliver directly into the cylinder, can tolerate much higher compression ratios for the same octane, but the side effect of that is fuel dilution, using more enrichment to control knock.
 
What compression ratio is considered to be high?
My GDI/Turbo Golf in sig. has 9.6:1 ratio.
9.6:1 for a port injected engine with forced induction would be considered high. The 6.2L HEMI has 9.5:1 and that's "high", requiring 91 at minimum.

The '03/'04 Cobra was 8.5:1, The same period F-150 Lightning was 8.4:1...etc.
 
Yes, that's traditionally been the case. For example, my 6.4L is 10.9:1, and calls for a minimum of 91. It pings BADLY on regular (I got a tank at a station that was supposed to be 91 and had to dilute it with 94 to get the pinging to stop). It is of course port-injected.

DI engines, because they can control when and how much fuel they deliver directly into the cylinder, can tolerate much higher compression ratios for the same octane, but the side effect of that is fuel dilution, using more enrichment to control knock.
My OM says it's ok to use 87 but for higher performance use 91. Also I live in 4,700 feet elevation and frequently drive up to 8,000 and I read one time that is better to use gas with lower octane at such elevation.
 
My OM says it's ok to use 87 but for higher performance use 91. Also I live in 4,700 feet elevation and frequently drive up to 8,000 and I read one time that is better to use gas with lower octane at such elevation.
Yeah, but you have DI, which is why they can get away with allowing 87.
 
I just changed the oil on my pre-loved '15 Fit (no turbo) to get the dealer swill out and the gas smell from the pan was overwhelming. OCI was 200 miles. So, I bought M1 ESP 0W-30 to thicken things up. Though the drained oil was alarmingly diluted, the oil felt surprisingly viscous. I don't know what they put in. I'm starting to think I bought a lemon, but for a 1.5L they go great and gas mileage is amazing at 43 MPG... at a cost.
 
The shorter O.C.s for the D.I. and G.D.I. defeat the purpose of savings for gas mileage :( . The 1st and 2nd generation FITs have the E.F.I. allowing longer oil intervals helping to save some 💵 . Average interval for the '13 FIT is around 7,600 miles . We passed on the 3rd generation due to fuel dilution and other issues . Shame , test drove and got 43 m.p.g.. Like the versatility . The flip up seats ( magic seats ) allow taller items to be placed in it . Have the 2nd generation .
 
Last edited:
Anyone can tell you to run a 30 weight oil, but they aren't going to pay your repair bills when Honda denies your warranty claim.
That's been beat to death and I've posted the owner's manuals several times. There is no SAE 30 recommended nor authorized by Honda in the USA for these vehicles.
OH, and "chances are nothing will happen" can be countered with a "what if it does and you blew your warranty?"
 
Anyone can tell you to run a 30 weight oil, but they aren't going to pay your repair bills when Honda denies your warranty claim.
That's been beat to death and I've posted the owner's manuals several times. There is no SAE 30 recommended nor authorized by Honda in the USA for these vehicles.
OH, and "chances are nothing will happen" can be countered with a "what if it does and you blew your warranty?"
So you're saying Honda uses different engines in other markets? The 1.5 DI Turbo in Europe has looser tolerances than the one in the US?
18CRVEurope.webp
 
Anyone can tell you to run a 30 weight oil, but they aren't going to pay your repair bills when Honda denies your warranty claim.
That's been beat to death and I've posted the owner's manuals several times. There is no SAE 30 recommended nor authorized by Honda in the USA for these vehicles.
OH, and "chances are nothing will happen" can be countered with a "what if it does and you blew your warranty?"
Maybe I missed it, but is there a specific statement that says the warranty will be void if a viscosity beside the "recommended" (not "required" or "demanded") is used? If so, got a snip-it of that OM statement?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom