Originally Posted By: IndyIan
So really the debate is, is our consumption/fossil fuel based lifestyle worth the gamble of raising the global temperature in the future?
The debate should be do we want to make profound, and likely irreversible, destructive economic changes, on the basis of dubious evidence, that when implemented will likely have little to no beneficial impact on a problem that may or may not even exist.
Let me know when China and India get on board this GW thing - they'll probably be too busy working, since that is where most of the jobs will be cap and traded to.