Anyone know about the UFO disclosure project
- Thread starter Exhaustgases
- Start date
- Status
It was just a matter of time before this became too big to hide. The ball was set in earnest motion in 2017.
I feel really badly for the poeple whose careers were ruined over reporting something they felt threatened by or was a safety risk - guys like Capt Terauchi who ended up flying a desk over what he experienced, and victims of shaming and discredit campaigns.
Imagine being one of the dopes that actually believed the government when they were told "there is nothing here to see".
How deep does the lie go?
Last edited:
The only folks that saw UFOs were on the ArtBell radio show.
This is also the first true bipartisan issue we’ve had before the congress in years. We’ve been divided on pandemics and insurrections but the aliens have brought us together.
The fact that it's being talked about to this level publicly under oath is a big step. Really makes you wonder who is really running the show.
Last edited:
Scroll to the 41 min mark where the three individuals provide their background and experience.
That's an internal lens reflection from the light in the lower right corner. Any photog has seen these countless times.
Just waiting for the big reveal. I know I saw alien technology UFO/UAP in the mid-late 1980s. Lengthy observation, low hovering, slow flying translucent large silent triangle, white lights on corners, ejected a red orb to earth.
Look, "they" are here, and have been for probably centuries. Many theories on that. It's clear to me humans have found crash sites, and studied the tech for decades. I have heard seemingly legit explanations as to how humans advanced so rapidly in technology, by studying alien tech to the best of our abilities.
I think guys like Bob Lazar are legit in their testimonies. Many of these witnesses, such as the Navy pilots from various videos, and others, have indicated that the videos released to public are the tip of the iceberg as to the videos and what has been recovered. I agree that we have been lied to and mislead by government for decades on this topic; it's too big to keep secret and, frankly, there's so much money involved I think .gov has realized the profitability in it versus the continued denials.
I eagerly await the big reveal and admissions we have been lied to. I won't hold my breath.
Look, "they" are here, and have been for probably centuries. Many theories on that. It's clear to me humans have found crash sites, and studied the tech for decades. I have heard seemingly legit explanations as to how humans advanced so rapidly in technology, by studying alien tech to the best of our abilities.
I think guys like Bob Lazar are legit in their testimonies. Many of these witnesses, such as the Navy pilots from various videos, and others, have indicated that the videos released to public are the tip of the iceberg as to the videos and what has been recovered. I agree that we have been lied to and mislead by government for decades on this topic; it's too big to keep secret and, frankly, there's so much money involved I think .gov has realized the profitability in it versus the continued denials.
I eagerly await the big reveal and admissions we have been lied to. I won't hold my breath.
MolaKule
Staff member
I don't think we've been lied to on this specific topic and I don't think we need to jump to conspiracy theories.
I do think we need more transparency and we do need some kind of central UAP clearing house with triage (as Grusch explained). This UAP clearing house would be staffed by scientists from every field and discipline, whose sole purpose is to investigate the full context of these phenomenon. I.e, a UAP Manhattan type-Project if you will, staffed with people with sufficient clearances to burrow through the red tape.
As for Bob Lazar, there are too many holes in his so-called physics to accept any of his testimony as being valid.
I do think we need more transparency and we do need some kind of central UAP clearing house with triage (as Grusch explained). This UAP clearing house would be staffed by scientists from every field and discipline, whose sole purpose is to investigate the full context of these phenomenon. I.e, a UAP Manhattan type-Project if you will, staffed with people with sufficient clearances to burrow through the red tape.
As for Bob Lazar, there are too many holes in his so-called physics to accept any of his testimony as being valid.
Community member, retired no less, and her husband walking their dog sees an object moving across the sky and takes a photo of it with their cell phone, posts it on our community site.
One thing we can be 100% certain of is that is not a lens reflection. So we now have that possibility out of the way.
Another member or two comments they seen them before, thinks it must be military.
Of course others go “wow” not knowing what it is can be said with 100% certainty.
Last edited:
How do you build something that's always blurry?
I’m a member of MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) and I‘m aware of the disclosure project. My first observation of a UFO was 1958 at the age of 5-1/2. I didn’t even know what it was until later in life when I learned about UFOs. My second observation was in 1986. I met a guy at White Sands New Mexico test center in the 80s and that pretty much sealed it for me.
By the way, Bob Lazar is the real deal. He had an old video posted about a month ago on YouTube but I think it’s been removed, or I just can’t find it again. He went into extensive detail on physics and the propulsion system, and explained how these vehicles traverse long distances without G-forces, and why some photos appear white or blurry. Example: When you strike a tuning fork and place it on your body, you can feel the vibration but you can’t readily see the oscillation. In my words, the propulsion generators on the craft exhibit a similar principle.
In rudimentary terms, I experienced a similar feeling when I took a particular medication that messed with my head. I was walking towards a palm tree, but the mental perception was that the palm tree was moving towards me as I walked. In another way, imagine walking on a treadmill and the object in front of you closes on you as you walk. Again, in my own words, the contraction of time and space is achieved when gravity and matter is manipulated; they are all connected.
By the way, Bob Lazar is the real deal. He had an old video posted about a month ago on YouTube but I think it’s been removed, or I just can’t find it again. He went into extensive detail on physics and the propulsion system, and explained how these vehicles traverse long distances without G-forces, and why some photos appear white or blurry. Example: When you strike a tuning fork and place it on your body, you can feel the vibration but you can’t readily see the oscillation. In my words, the propulsion generators on the craft exhibit a similar principle.
In rudimentary terms, I experienced a similar feeling when I took a particular medication that messed with my head. I was walking towards a palm tree, but the mental perception was that the palm tree was moving towards me as I walked. In another way, imagine walking on a treadmill and the object in front of you closes on you as you walk. Again, in my own words, the contraction of time and space is achieved when gravity and matter is manipulated; they are all connected.
Last edited:
Yeah isn’t thst amazing? (And frustrating) More so the daylight photos but this one at night considering it was at night and a slow shutter speed is mostly clear but read on.
We see more blurry photos in the digital age as we digitally zoom in on a photo is an easy process but the image lacks the resolution (information) to keep the image clear.
I don’t know if the person zoomed at all on this image but I suspect not as it’s pretty clear for a night photo on an unknown cell phone when you don’t zoom in on it.
The second photo obviously is digitally zoomed.
Also note how terrible the entire image is. Not just the UFO, people in general have finger smudges all over their cell phones lens but this could be a simple case of a slow shutter. It could be either one but looking at the photo more even the bushes under the light pole is blurry.
Last edited:
It’s bad, listening to the testimony and to be clear I’m only talking about the testimony. Hoping this thread that someone started can stay open.
Of peoples lives destroyed, physical harm and perceived threats of murder.
I find this more scary than the UFOs.
We may not agree on a lot of things but I agree with you 100% on this.
The cats out of the bag!
It has been...I can't get away from it.
Yup...but I need a fair bit more hard evidence before I'm convinced of anything. My hope is this either results in the release of undeniably credible hard evidence (and I’m not remotely holding my breath) or it finally puts what is just nonsense to rest.
As an aside…based on my knowledge of various BITOG members and their positions on other matters which do or don’t have various levels of evidence, I was able to predict with 100% accuracy who is all in on this and who isn’t. I’d love to have a better understanding of the conspiratorial mind because it drives the motives of so many Americans these days and my brain just doesn’t work that way.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2023
- Messages
- 1,434
There is supposedly classified physical evidence. It’s a fact that there is corroborating visual and sensor data of UAPs, and I consider that hard evidence.
There isn’t really any question anymore that these things exist. The only question is what their actual nature and origin may be.
We are now in a different paradigm; it is no longer reasonable to deny that these phenomena exist or even that there was a conspiracy to cover up evidence. Continuing to do so is cognitive dissonance at work.
In understanding our universe it is important both to remain skeptical of what is apparently unsubstantiated, AND accept what is apparently substantiated. While there are people with wild unhinged speculations, there are others who cling to incorrect past models. Both are believing what they want to be true rather than what the current evidence of truth is.
Last edited:
I think he's going to be found to be right if we ever can truly get to the bottom of this. Just my guess. There are some holes in his record for sure, and some red flags, but overall, my gut tells me he is not lying.
I completely understand the skeptics mindset. I was once one. In fact, I used to make fun of this topic. I eventually looked into it, and I could not ignore all the testimonial evidence from hundreds of highly credible witnesses to such events whether that be military personal, working professionals etc. While I have not seen one personally, I am trusting of many that have. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I believe that evidence exists, but it needs to be publicly shared.
Graves, Fravor and Grusche are highly credible individuals. I have full confidence in their stories.
Kind of like trusting HPL or Amsoil who actually haven't run any of the engine tests.
Graves, Fravor and Grusche are highly credible individuals. I have full confidence in their stories.
Kind of like trusting HPL or Amsoil who actually haven't run any of the engine tests.
- Status
Similar threads
