amsoil or motul, which one really was first?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
2,364
Location
sebring, florida
i was reading up on wikipedia about synthetic oils. the article i am reading cites motul as the first synthetic oil to meet api standards, in 1971.
"Although in use in the aerospace industry for some years prior, synthetic oil first became commercially available in an API-approved formula for automobile engines when the French Oil company MOTUL introduced a commercial ester-based synthetic oil in 1971[1]. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_oil
i seem to remember amsoil claiming to be the first synthetic oil to meet api standards, but in 1972. the wikipedia atricle does not seem to state a source of info. one the less it would be interesting if true.
i put in an email to motul to inquire about this. i have not recieved a reply yet. i also emailed a texas based motul distributor with the same question.
wondering if one of you guys could shed some light on the subject.
 
Quote:


PABLO YOUR BACK!




What's wrong with his back?
confused.gif
 
Conoco Polar Start was a full synthetic hydrocarbon and it exceeded all API engine tests and was available in the USA in 1968. It was taken off the market a few years later due to lack of sales. So Amsoil was not the first full synthetic to pass API .
 
"Polar Start was a full synthetic hydrocarbon and it exceeded all API engine tests and was available in the USA in 1968. It was taken off the market a few years later due to lack of sales. So Amsoil was not the first full synthetic to pass API ."
First I've heard of this. Tell us more.
 
Who cares, it's 2007. Synthetics were around well before then anyway but just not for passenger car use.
tongue.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom