Originally Posted By: mpvue
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: mpvue
Originally Posted By: harley145000
My 07 camary warranty says 6 months or 5,000 miles for oil change,ill stick with that.
camary? is that the new chevy coupe w/ yellow feathers?
sorry, couldn't resist.
personally, I think people fret over oil changes too much (am I allowed to say that here?)
sorry, engines don't fail from old oil. I've had engines w/ black sludge on the dipstick still running. I had a 350 chevy w/ so much crud around the rockers you couldn't see the drainback holes. I tore apart a running 283 that had lifters stuck so bad they had to be hammered out. I had a saturn that was run down to a qt so many times I lost count; it was still running when I swapped it out.
I run amsoil in my cars now because I feel it provides superior lubrication and I can run it longer. I don't care one way or the other about the warranty; my feeling is that it's easy to offer because they won't get taken up on it.
as for that motorhome, well, if an engine fails because the oil hasn't been changed in 7K, well, that engine is a PO S. there was plenty of evidence presented there that those engines were known for bad bearings. just one more reason I don't own fords.
No, you just own a vehicle made by a company Ford owns a majority share in........Mazda.
There is a MASSIVE difference between a MOTORHOME and a sub-2000lb Saturn in terms of how much load is being put on that engine.
But hey, I watched a 350 throw a rod through the side on an over-rev with Mobil 1 in the sump, does that make me automatically assume that they were [censored] engines? After all, they were known to oval their bores and their firing order pounds the rod bearings on the 1st two cylinders, hence the reason the LSx series engines have the same cylinder firing order as the Ford 302HO/351W/4.6L/5.4L....etc.
But I digress, I'm simply the owner of a few 302's from a family that has had nothing but spectacular luck with Ford's going right back to the Model A, what do I know compared to somebody judging an engine failure based on speculation and rhetoric in a thread on the Internet.
I may not be a GM fan, but I won't call their engines [censored]. Guess that's the difference between a Ford guy and a GM guy.
well phrased response, nice job.
I think you would agree, w/o speculation and rhetoric this site would use a lot less bandwidth. me, I don't take it personally when someone rags on a car I own (I don't have loyalties to inanimate objects) and when I make a negative comment about a car, well, that's all it is. still doesn't make sense to me that 7K oil would cause an engine to fail, but hey, fine. I'm glad you enjoy your fords.
btw, my Mazda MPV is a 'real' Mazda, made in Hiroshima, w/ a real Mazda 18V 3.0. no ford content whatsoever. I wouldn't buy a new Mazda w/ a ford engine. and, it would be nice to have a 'sub-2000lb' saturn, but they are more around 2400-2600lbs.
But Ford still owns 40% of Mazda
I was thinking of the SC1, which is 2,200lbs. I thought it was lighter, but apparently that's what it weighs.