Amsoil dispels the One Arm Bandit test.
- Thread starter StevieC
- Start date
- Status
Last edited:
It has EVERYTHING to do with that video...misapplied tests are misapplied test...
2017
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g27.pdf
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2133.pdf (less than 12 months old that one).
2016
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g3395.pdf
Note these are all CURRENT data sheets.
BTW, is a video filmed in 2010 still relevant in 2018 ?...after all, that's OLD ...LOL
2017
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g27.pdf
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2133.pdf (less than 12 months old that one).
2016
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g3395.pdf
Note these are all CURRENT data sheets.
BTW, is a video filmed in 2010 still relevant in 2018 ?...after all, that's OLD ...LOL
And it has other applicable ASTM tests as well. Not just 4-ball. So who cares that they list tests that are meaningless for this type of product if the others are included that do matter?
You are making a mountain out of nothing.
A video from any date explaining why this is a bad way to prove anything is a good thing. Lots of newbies here that don't understand it.
Just further proves my point that you just want to slander them because of your own agenda. None of what you brought up has anything to do with this video explaining why this form of testing is not a proper way to prove anything. It happens to be put out my Amsoil and that all of a sudden seems to give you a license to slander the brand once again with your nonsense.
You are making a mountain out of nothing.
A video from any date explaining why this is a bad way to prove anything is a good thing. Lots of newbies here that don't understand it.
Just further proves my point that you just want to slander them because of your own agenda. None of what you brought up has anything to do with this video explaining why this form of testing is not a proper way to prove anything. It happens to be put out my Amsoil and that all of a sudden seems to give you a license to slander the brand once again with your nonsense.
Last edited:
Originally Posted by StevieC
And it has ASTM tests as well. Not just 4-ball. So who cares?
Because it's irony that a company that consistently, for the life of the company, over the majority of their products have defended the use of a misapplied grease/EP test...disproves a misapplied grease and EP test as charitanism…In a period where they DIDN'T use the Sequence IVA
Seriously, don't you see the funny side ?
And it has ASTM tests as well. Not just 4-ball. So who cares?
Because it's irony that a company that consistently, for the life of the company, over the majority of their products have defended the use of a misapplied grease/EP test...disproves a misapplied grease and EP test as charitanism…In a period where they DIDN'T use the Sequence IVA
Seriously, don't you see the funny side ?
Last edited:
Last edited:
Last edited:
Amsoil has always, always, always struck me as the over promoted, over marketed, and over the top in general. Their sales and marketing effort turns me away from ever considering using them.
Why do they have to come across so arrogant, deceitful, and holier than thou? Don't they know that drives people to their competitors?
A little class and a little restraint would go such a long way to improve their image.
Why do they have to come across so arrogant, deceitful, and holier than thou? Don't they know that drives people to their competitors?
A little class and a little restraint would go such a long way to improve their image.
Any other company using "Go Big" "Be over the top" would be praised especially being an American company bu in Amsoil's case? Oh no. It's trash them to the max here. Only SOPUS and M1 are the god-children here.
used oil analysis say otherwise when compared to the mileages these withstand compared to AMSOIL Signature Series in the same applications but it's about heresay here not about actual lab testing proving what the lubricant is capable of.
Anyway, this thread isn't about that so lets bring it back to the one-arm bandit tester and this is good information as to why it's a useless snake-oil type test that proves nothing.
used oil analysis say otherwise when compared to the mileages these withstand compared to AMSOIL Signature Series in the same applications but it's about heresay here not about actual lab testing proving what the lubricant is capable of.
Anyway, this thread isn't about that so lets bring it back to the one-arm bandit tester and this is good information as to why it's a useless snake-oil type test that proves nothing.
Last edited:
Oh Burla is back. I wonder how Redline would have worked in this test with its nano-robots that repair Hemi ticking.
Originally Posted by Shannow
Originally Posted by StevieC
And it has ASTM tests as well. Not just 4-ball. So who cares?
Because it's irony that a company that consistently, for the life of the company, over the majority of their products have defended the use of a misapplied grease/EP test...disproves a misapplied grease and EP test as charitanism…In a period where they DIDN'T use the Sequence IVA
Seriously, don't you see the funny side ?
Yeah I agree Shannow.. it is funny
Originally Posted by StevieC
And it has ASTM tests as well. Not just 4-ball. So who cares?
Because it's irony that a company that consistently, for the life of the company, over the majority of their products have defended the use of a misapplied grease/EP test...disproves a misapplied grease and EP test as charitanism…In a period where they DIDN'T use the Sequence IVA
Seriously, don't you see the funny side ?
Yeah I agree Shannow.. it is funny
Originally Posted by StevieC
Oh Burla is back. I wonder how Redline would have worked in this test with its nano-robots that repair Hemi ticking.
Nano technology is a powerful thing. It was proven on a British document called Red Dwarf to be able to regenerate a spaceship and its crew centuries later. Quite impressive.
Oh Burla is back. I wonder how Redline would have worked in this test with its nano-robots that repair Hemi ticking.
Nano technology is a powerful thing. It was proven on a British document called Red Dwarf to be able to regenerate a spaceship and its crew centuries later. Quite impressive.
The last time I saw Moly, she was like 400 lbs.
- Status
