There is/was a member who wrote extensively on the topic of battery charging, and the needs of AGMs, in the past.
The technical differences can't be dismissed, but the practical differences are more open to question.
If one is willing to potentially sacrifice some of the capacity and service life of a higher cost battery, that's acceptable to some and not to others; at least the risk lies mostly with the battery, and not the vehicle. As repeatedly seen, "best practices" aren't necessarily followed, or followed consistently.
In practical terms, "NHAP" experiences and the lack of empirical testing make it hard to quantify what might have been sacrificed, also having to take into account usage factors.
I'm kind of having this debate now, for a vehicle where I know the bulk charging phase occurs at 13.8v, and the absorption a couple tenths lower.
That's within the bounds for a FLA battery, but not an AGM that wants to see 14.4v or higher.
The technical differences can't be dismissed, but the practical differences are more open to question.
If one is willing to potentially sacrifice some of the capacity and service life of a higher cost battery, that's acceptable to some and not to others; at least the risk lies mostly with the battery, and not the vehicle. As repeatedly seen, "best practices" aren't necessarily followed, or followed consistently.
In practical terms, "NHAP" experiences and the lack of empirical testing make it hard to quantify what might have been sacrificed, also having to take into account usage factors.
I'm kind of having this debate now, for a vehicle where I know the bulk charging phase occurs at 13.8v, and the absorption a couple tenths lower.
That's within the bounds for a FLA battery, but not an AGM that wants to see 14.4v or higher.