Aftermarket Oil filter for HD Twin cam

Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
22
Has anyone used a HiFlo Filtro HF171B RC on a 103 or any other of their filters on a Big
Twin?
 
I have been using them for a few years now on my Twinky 103. They are very popular amongst the HD crowd.
They are heavy and seem to be well constructed including a nut on the end which is really nice on a HD. Other than that I cannot add much info on them except I will continue to use them.
 
Has anyone used a HiFlo Filtro HF171B RC on a 103 or any other of their filters on a Big
Twin?
Yes, just two times. I had a rough time installing and mostly removing because the engine sensor is in the way and the HiFlow if I remember correctly is a little bit wider. Of course also the HD oil filter tool doesnt fit it.
I can not say for sure but in my mind, I felt as if I had more engine noise at start up for a second or two. Almost like after you change oil, the tick noise but for a shorter period. I questioned to myself if the bypass valve was not in spec.

Anyway, I gave up, the HD filters are great but have become more than pricey, I found some Wix that I have tried, was happy with it, nope HD filter wrench does fit that either but I mange, thing is the next two that I ordered both at different times came in dented. Gave up on them. But nice filter and feel it's more specific to match the HD filter specs.

So, just for fun, for the first time ever in 9 years I put a Fram on it. Doubt it matches HD specs but it's a filter and zero start up noise vs the HiFlo. I just installed the Fram about a month ago and I am ok with it, whether I continue I'll figure out in the future. Most likely I will continue. Had a great ride yesterday temps hit 70, rural roads and then to the beach.
 
I change my oil and filter once a year,,,I only average about 4k miles or less,,the norm on motorcycles is under 4 k miles a year....sometime I get my o. f . at autozone and sometimes at the Harley store,,its not a budget breaker
 
Whip City Wrencher did a comparison video of a Harley filter and a regular Hiflo non-RC filter. The Hiflo had a lot more filter media, and the media looked to be less porous under a microscope, so it's likely more efficient. The RC version should be more efficient yet. The Hiflo seems to have better build quality as well.
 
Yes, just two times. I had a rough time installing and mostly removing because the engine sensor is in the way and the HiFlow if I remember correctly is a little bit wider. Of course also the HD oil filter tool doesnt fit it.
I can not say for sure but in my mind, I felt as if I had more engine noise at start up for a second or two. Almost like after you change oil, the tick noise but for a shorter period. I questioned to myself if the bypass valve was not in spec.

Anyway, I gave up, the HD filters are great but have become more than pricey, I found some Wix that I have tried, was happy with it, nope HD filter wrench does fit that either but I mange, thing is the next two that I ordered both at different times came in dented. Gave up on them. But nice filter and feel it's more specific to match the HD filter specs.

So, just for fun, for the first time ever in 9 years I put a Fram on it. Doubt it matches HD specs but it's a filter and zero start up noise vs the HiFlo. I just installed the Fram about a month ago and I am ok with it, whether I continue I'll figure out in the future. Most likely I will continue. Had a great ride yesterday temps hit 70, rural roads and then to the beach.
The H Flo has a nut welded on the end similar l to k&n.
 
Has anyone used a HiFlo Filtro HF171B RC on a 103 or any other of their filters on a Big
Twin?

Yes. On our 2016 Heritage Softail 103. I use the HF 171 CRC (chrome, with nut on the end)
This is the correct filter, according to HiFlo application matrix.

Been using them for years on three Road Kings and this third Heritage Softail.

https://www.hiflofiltro.com/catalogue/model/5914
 
Looking at their website,they’re made in Thailand and TUV approved. They appear to use premium quality suppliers.
Not sure of your reply as to who but if it matters its largely rumored K&N is made by Hi-Flo. Adding to the rumor is K&N motorcycle filters are made in, yes, same place as Hi-Flo Thailand. I'll leave it to that.

There are many Youtube videos on that subject. But you may find this interesting pertaining to BMW filters. The K&N looks very similar inside. Any variances could easily be attributed to production runs. The K&N in this one does not have the nut on the end, that could be simply because it's for a BMW or some HiFLo's come with the option to not have the nut.


Not related to Hi-Flo but dont feel bad about abandoning HD filters which I recently did abandon and actually put a Fram on (gulp) thanks to you, I just ran across this, incredibly interesting to say the least!!!!! Keep in mind, I dont think this is compared to a HD micron filter... I just find it interesting.



I am not typically a YouTube person but you cant deny the actual photos. This is freaking scary and I was a proponent of HD filters in the past... I think I may just stay with Fram or try Hi-Flo again.
 
Last edited:
@Rob C
I am not typically a YouTube person but you cant deny the actual photos. This is freaking scary and I was a proponent of HD filters in the past... I think I may just stay with Fram but either way, just look in the filter.

 
This “dire warning” has been covered it’s not unique to HD and has been seen in various brands.

FWIW the last couple SP5 I have seen have had excellent louvers.
You know? For years now, just not motorcycles I always wondered if the louvers (or the stamped holes) ever restrict. I am sure they are fine but Im back in the camp of preferring the plastic cage if given the choice. I dont stress about it, mostly*LOL*
 
You know? For years now, just not motorcycles I always wondered if the louvers (or the stamped holes) ever restrict. I am sure they are fine but Im back in the camp of preferring the plastic cage if given the choice. I dont stress about it, mostly*LOL*
I've calculated the pressure drop across the centre tube of a louvered PurolatorOne filter using an online pressure drop calculator. It worked out to be on the order of 1% of the total filter dP. The inlet holes on the filter base were a bit more restrictive at 2% of total dP. So almost all of the restriction is from the media, and the centre tube is hardly going to restrict flow unless maybe it's defective and most of the louvers are closed, which can happen.
 
I've calculated the pressure drop across the centre tube of a louvered PurolatorOne filter using an online pressure drop calculator. It worked out to be on the order of 1% of the total filter dP. The inlet holes on the filter base were a bit more restrictive at 2% of total dP. So almost all of the restriction is from the media, and the centre tube is hardly going to restrict flow unless maybe it's defective and most of the louvers are closed, which can happen.
Good post.
Yeah, I figure it has to be ok or filters would not be able to be made that way. Though I find comfort with a plastic cage because to me there is less room for a manufacturing defect as disclosed by the metal louvers that were not properly punched.
 
@Rob C
I am not typically a YouTube person but you cant deny the actual photos. This is freaking scary and I was a proponent of HD filters in the past... I think I may just stay with Fram but either way, just look in the filter.


Louvers strike again. These are the same exact filter brand/model. This is how much variation can happen with louvers. It really doesn't take rocket science to make louvers correctly. 😒

1704512365070.png
 
Back
Top Bottom