In the response from Pennzoil about Ultra there was a question about DI engines, specifically the GM 3.6L DI. The question pertained to the NOACK % of PU & potential impact on intake valves. Pennzoil’s response was as follows:
Oil volatility is not a significant factor for inlet valve deposits in a direct injection gasoline engine. The significant factor is viscosity modifier type and concentration, so using fully synthetic narrow span viscosity grades such as 5W-20 is beneficial. In North America, there is no specification calling for NOACK of less than 10%. The most important thing for DI engines is engine design, to better prevent deposits on ITV’s (In Take Valves), since there is no fuel wash as in PFI (Port Fuel Injection) engines.
Key statement, “The significant factor is viscosity modifier type and concentration, so using fully synthetic narrow span viscosity grades such as 5W-20 is beneficial.”
Naturally, the 3.6L DI calls for 5W30 however, based on Pennzoil’s response, are they saying a 10W30 would be better then a 0W or 5W30? If not, what are they saying?
Oil volatility is not a significant factor for inlet valve deposits in a direct injection gasoline engine. The significant factor is viscosity modifier type and concentration, so using fully synthetic narrow span viscosity grades such as 5W-20 is beneficial. In North America, there is no specification calling for NOACK of less than 10%. The most important thing for DI engines is engine design, to better prevent deposits on ITV’s (In Take Valves), since there is no fuel wash as in PFI (Port Fuel Injection) engines.
Key statement, “The significant factor is viscosity modifier type and concentration, so using fully synthetic narrow span viscosity grades such as 5W-20 is beneficial.”
Naturally, the 3.6L DI calls for 5W30 however, based on Pennzoil’s response, are they saying a 10W30 would be better then a 0W or 5W30? If not, what are they saying?