Originally Posted by dnewton3
It's a bit more complicated than that. Much of it depends upon how you believe the math represents certain assumptions such as sigma-shift over time, etc.
But as a GENERALIZATION, 6-sigma will result in 2700 defects per million, ignoring the sigma shift topic.
We shoot for 4-sigma; 67 DPMO.
Which again proves that nothing is "perfect".
You are correct, it is a bit more complicated that that.
The post was written with the audience in mind.
It was not an attempt to delve into the subtleties of Six Sigma techniques.
It's a bit more complicated than that. Much of it depends upon how you believe the math represents certain assumptions such as sigma-shift over time, etc.
But as a GENERALIZATION, 6-sigma will result in 2700 defects per million, ignoring the sigma shift topic.
We shoot for 4-sigma; 67 DPMO.
Which again proves that nothing is "perfect".
You are correct, it is a bit more complicated that that.
The post was written with the audience in mind.
It was not an attempt to delve into the subtleties of Six Sigma techniques.