Not long after Shell bought out Pennzoil-Quaker State, they discontinued all of their commercial-industrial lines, and several low volume automotive products. The GL-4s were one of those.Whatever happened to Pennzoil GL4 Gearplus?
Not long after Shell bought out Pennzoil-Quaker State, they discontinued all of their commercial-industrial lines, and several low volume automotive products. The GL-4s were one of those.Whatever happened to Pennzoil GL4 Gearplus?
This seems like the kind of mentality that leaves you with metal flakes in your drain pan every 30k.We've used GL5's and GL4 marine gear oils in the shop since the 1980's and NEVER had one come back with synchro problems. Suddenly, every manual owner is either too incompetent to drive a manual, or too lazy to change the gear oil out regularly, has problems with so-called chemistry, synchros, or certain fluids. I'd also guess that maybe the LS additives weren't standard ages ago like now. Or, maybe owners weren't limpwristed snowflakes back then and were man enough shift a transmission with straight 140 grade when its 0°F outside.
Yep, I talk to my Oronite reps about once a month.more info
the OLOA 9750 was the first Borate addtive.
This has a an ester to disperse the solids borate but the borate is Not like in modern engine oils it was a dispersed solid.
After scuffing issues were found in certain applications
they went to adding SP then was called OLOA 9151
S is shown as 4.04%
P is shown as 6.42
As I remember there was some problems with water dissolving the borate out of the oil and then when evaporated on a seal lip the hard deposit that formed caused seal leakage. I think if water ingress was nil or
The biggest improvement was very long fluid life compared at that time (1982) to mineral oil non syn fluids.
In one test truck field test running past 120K miles with very low fe wear 500ppm fe.
Also this type oil (borate) had very low wear rates better when thin so a 75w or 80w oil could provide as good or better protection than a 140.
Offering improved mileage.
Been 40 years kinda forget some of this but neat stuff.
There is a constant need for education regarding these gear fluids since there are recurring, multiple misunderstandings of a manual transmission fluid's interaction with the internal mechanics of a Manual Transmission....BTW, no need to turn this thread into a classroom. Nobody cares about the chemistry of the fluids or how to blend them. Save it for your students. And, yes, some of us know but don't brag about it constantly. The debate and requirements of a spec is irrelevant. Oh, and yes, I under what is required for the GL4/GL5/MT1 specs. Big fooking deal. Do you know how to make a syncro or a transmission gear? have you ever made one? or how to tear a manual transmission apart, address shortcomings on prototypes, and put them back together updated for said shortcomings? Yes, its all irrelevant to the OP's thread.
That's what I'm running in our '09 Mazda 5. Bought it from a local NAPA.Whatever happened to Pennzoil GL4 Gearplus?
That's what I'm running in our '09 Mazda 5. Bought it from a local NAPA.
Whoa, that's weird! Usually we miss out on all the good stuff that's available in the States.Napa sells that Pennzoil 75w90 GL4 in Canada, but not the US
GL-4, GL-5 are not "Grades," they are wear protection ratings for gearing and bearings in gear trains.Not to be even more difficult, but it isn’t GL5 that also states GL4 any more than GL4 that also states GL5. Oils say meets or exceeds GL4, GL5 is just that. There is no second position for either grade. As far as I know. If it says what my manual says, then it’s ok. Then I go do something else. ⛷
Except a Pennzoil 75w-90 GL-4 is still listed as currently available on their updated product website in the usa.Not long after Shell bought out Pennzoil-Quaker State, they discontinued all of their commercial-industrial lines, and several low volume automotive products. The GL-4s were one of those.
I think it is fine to call GL4, 5 grades, very broad meaning in that word. I would still call it grades. It is interesting, because on this site the word weight is used constantly for oil viscosities. There should be a lecture on that to the folks. GL4 or 5 is fine my friend for my Toyota, they say so, the oil bottle says so. As an end user that’s all I need to think about. Thanks.GL-4, GL-5 are not "Grades," they are wear protection ratings for gearing and bearings in gear trains.
Grades describe a range or ranges of viscosity.
GL-4 is a wear protection rating primarily for light truck and passenger car manual transmissions because a.) of the lower torque loads encountered, b.) the type of internal gearing used. A major chemistry component in GL-4 fluids is the Anti-wear chemistry, usually a good dose of ZDDP. For MT's with synchronizers, special friction modifier chemistry is required.
What this means is not ALL GL-X fluids are designed to be used in manual transmissions because they do not contain the correct mix of chemistry.
This is why GM had Texaco develop the "Synchromesh" transmission fluid for their synchronized transmissions, an application-specific or "dedicated" fluid just for synchronized transmissions to improve shifting.
GL-5 covers highly loaded (Hypoid) differentials and OTR (MT-1) truck transmissions where high torque loads are encountered and use different gearing designs than do light truck and passenger manual transmissions. MT-1 transmissions may or may not be synchronized and usually contain all steel alloys. The anti-wear protective additive pack in GL-5 fluids contains Extreme Pressure chemistry, with the primary chemistry historically being Sulfur-Phosphorus additives.
Except a Pennzoil 75w-90 GL-4 is still listed as currently available on their updated product website in the usa.
When it was my job to sell it, we were told it was being disco'd, and would be unavailable when current stocks were depleted. There was a Shell Spirax S2 GL-4 to replace it.Except a Pennzoil 75w-90 GL-4 is still listed as currently available on their updated product website in the usa.
Interesting, I've seen Shell Spirax gear oil products on the shelf in Europe, but not in the USA..Unfortunately, it isn't actually sold anywhere in the US
Napa carries it in Canada. I've seen a few listings of the PP GL4 on eBay, and from a couple obscure sites like evolubesupply (which also sells on eBay), but it just doesn't exist on the she;f of any US retail store.
The only 75w90 GL4 for sale in a US store is Liqui Moly from Napa, and even then, it might not actually be in-stock, so you have to order it, but it will arrive at the store in a day or two.
No it's not fine to call a gear protection rating a Grade because it is incorrect.I think it is fine to call GL4, 5 grades, very broad meaning in that word. I would still call it grades. It is interesting, because on this site the word weight is used constantly for oil viscosities. There should be a lecture on that to the folks. GL4 or 5 is fine my friend for my Toyota, they say so, the oil bottle says so. As an end user that’s all I need to think about. Thanks.
No it's not fine to call a gear protection rating a Grade because it is incorrect.
The word "weight" is often used incorrectly but a Grade is the correct term for a range of viscosities and people get corrected and educated about it.
If you want to converse properly in the oil industry then you must use the correct terminology.
A person coming here is not required to be licensed in oil industry jargon. English meaning of grade covers millions of subjects. As long as I said GL4 or 5 grade there is no reason to not be able to understand it in your terms. Viscosity I say grade too. What I can’t say is weight which is nonsense. I always think of tires and their “thread.” So what do you call GL4 when you don’t want a lot of words? I certainly will never write gear protection rating every time. Any suggestions on a word? Class? Type? Maybe it’s just Rating. Ok, GL4 rating, how’s that? Sounds pretty good to me. I mean in an oil experts place that calls oil grades by weights, give me a break calling something a grade versus rating. All said in good humor.No it's not fine to call a gear protection rating a Grade because it is incorrect.
The word "weight" is often used incorrectly but a Grade is the correct term for a range of viscosities and people get corrected and educated about it.
If you want to converse properly in the oil industry then you must use the correct terminology.