$329 torque wrench at Harbor Freight

how about a link.. cant find it.

speaking of links.. this one is an EXACT replica of my precision instuments split beam torque wrench
HF ICON
https://www.harborfreight.com/hand-...fessional-split-beam-torque-wrench-57923.html

Precision instruments
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002XMSFIM/

Even the specs are the same.. makes you wonder if its a knockoff or a private labeling.

only one I could find is not 329$ shows 159.99
It does torque angle.
https://www.harborfreight.com/12-in-drive-digital-torque-wrench-64916.html

Seems like a nice piece but I would need one once every 5 years.. and I love my split beam for anything not requiring angle.
 
Last edited:

That link shows up as this
image_2022-02-08_210242.png


This link works
https://www.harborfreight.com/12-in-professional-flex-head-digital-angle-torque-wrench-56683.html

For the price I'd try to use the 160$ model if I used it everyday.. I'd probably spend on the snapon.
330$ is abit rough for HF but then again it is lifetime warranty.. so that would give me a little more confidence.
 
I get the email about it today. I can't justify that kind of money for anything from HF. I'll stick to my PREC3FR250F which cost me about half of the HF tool.
I have that 250 ft-lb PI split beam wrench you linked. I am very disappointed with it and with PI in general.

I bought it last year, have put it through less that 50 cycles, none of them over 150ft-lb, and recently sent it to an accredited calibration lab. It tested 12% high at 50 ft-lb, and 4.3% high at 150 ft-lb. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1% of the target value.

I also have a 600 in-lb PI split beam that I bought in 2020. It tested 5.4% high at 120 in-lb and 4.3% high at 360 in-lb. It had less than 50 cycles on it at time of testing. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1.2% of the target value.

PI split beam wrenches are hugely overrated, IMO. You get a wrench that fails to meet its 4% accuracy specification, you get a pseudo calibration certificate with no test data on it, you get a wrench that was very likely not tested after manufacturing, and you get only a 90 day warranty.
 
I have that 250 ft-lb PI split beam wrench you linked. I am very disappointed with it and with PI in general.

I bought it last year, have put it through less that 50 cycles, none of them over 150ft-lb, and recently sent it to an accredited calibration lab. It tested 12% high at 50 ft-lb, and 4.3% high at 150 ft-lb. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1% of the target value.

I also have a 600 in-lb PI split beam that I bought in 2020. It tested 5.4% high at 120 in-lb and 4.3% high at 360 in-lb. It had less than 50 cycles on it at time of testing. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1.2% of the target value.

PI split beam wrenches are hugely overrated, IMO. You get a wrench that fails to meet its 4% accuracy specification, you get a pseudo calibration certificate with no test data on it, you get a wrench that was very likely not tested after manufacturing, and you get only a 90 day warranty.
That sucks. I still have more faith in the PI wrench than the HF wrench. @Trav had turned me onto them, he has been using the PI wrenches for years IIRC w/o issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC1
I have that 250 ft-lb PI split beam wrench you linked. I am very disappointed with it and with PI in general.

I bought it last year, have put it through less that 50 cycles, none of them over 150ft-lb, and recently sent it to an accredited calibration lab. It tested 12% high at 50 ft-lb, and 4.3% high at 150 ft-lb. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1% of the target value.

I also have a 600 in-lb PI split beam that I bought in 2020. It tested 5.4% high at 120 in-lb and 4.3% high at 360 in-lb. It had less than 50 cycles on it at time of testing. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1.2% of the target value.

PI split beam wrenches are hugely overrated, IMO. You get a wrench that fails to meet its 4% accuracy specification, you get a pseudo calibration certificate with no test data on it, you get a wrench that was very likely not tested after manufacturing, and you get only a 90 day warranty.
I have had mine for years and use it a lot, it is still accurate under 4%, it is possible the initial calibration was off.
 
https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/threads/electronic-digital-torque-wrench.462191/post-8678805

If eclatorq is still making these for HF, $329 for the 1/2" is a great deal.

I just wished it went up to 300 ft-lbs.
Is eclaitorq who makes the SO one? I suspect SO is also from overseas if it’s digital…

I need to do some bolts that require angle. I’m thinking to just buy a quality mechanical angle gauge. I get
It that a digital wrench is going to be more convenient. But I am not sure the cost differential is worth it outside of a production environment.
 
Is eclaitorq who makes the SO one? I suspect SO is also from overseas if it’s digital…

I need to do some bolts that require angle. I’m thinking to just buy a quality mechanical angle gauge. I get
It that a digital wrench is going to be more convenient. But I am not sure the cost differential is worth it outside of a production environment.
No, Snap-On is in-house.
 
I need to do some bolts that require angle. I’m thinking to just buy a quality mechanical angle gauge. I get
It that a digital wrench is going to be more convenient. But I am not sure the cost differential is worth it outside of a production environment.
For a few bolts? Why not just mark the bolt or socket with the angle and tighten to it. If you just want to justify buying another tool, I can sympathize.
 
Back
Top Bottom