HF promotes it as a new product. Large digital angle torque wrench. Seems like a lot of money to spend for a torque wrench from any company short of SnapOn.
More likely, both are sourcing from the same vendor in Taiwan.ICON DATW12-250 $330
View attachment 88218
View attachment 88222
Cornwell CTG5000ANGX at $550
View attachment 88219
View attachment 88223
I’d guess it’s just made by Cornwell for HF
I have that 250 ft-lb PI split beam wrench you linked. I am very disappointed with it and with PI in general.I get the email about it today. I can't justify that kind of money for anything from HF. I'll stick to my PREC3FR250F which cost me about half of the HF tool.
https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/threads/electronic-digital-torque-wrench.462191/post-8678805More likely, both are sourcing from the same vendor in Taiwan.
That sucks. I still have more faith in the PI wrench than the HF wrench. @Trav had turned me onto them, he has been using the PI wrenches for years IIRC w/o issue.I have that 250 ft-lb PI split beam wrench you linked. I am very disappointed with it and with PI in general.
I bought it last year, have put it through less that 50 cycles, none of them over 150ft-lb, and recently sent it to an accredited calibration lab. It tested 12% high at 50 ft-lb, and 4.3% high at 150 ft-lb. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1% of the target value.
I also have a 600 in-lb PI split beam that I bought in 2020. It tested 5.4% high at 120 in-lb and 4.3% high at 360 in-lb. It had less than 50 cycles on it at time of testing. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1.2% of the target value.
PI split beam wrenches are hugely overrated, IMO. You get a wrench that fails to meet its 4% accuracy specification, you get a pseudo calibration certificate with no test data on it, you get a wrench that was very likely not tested after manufacturing, and you get only a 90 day warranty.
Eclatorq makes good stuff. They make the MAC/Proto ones.It does look decent. I am not seeing $565 worth of difference.
I have had mine for years and use it a lot, it is still accurate under 4%, it is possible the initial calibration was off.I have that 250 ft-lb PI split beam wrench you linked. I am very disappointed with it and with PI in general.
I bought it last year, have put it through less that 50 cycles, none of them over 150ft-lb, and recently sent it to an accredited calibration lab. It tested 12% high at 50 ft-lb, and 4.3% high at 150 ft-lb. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1% of the target value.
I also have a 600 in-lb PI split beam that I bought in 2020. It tested 5.4% high at 120 in-lb and 4.3% high at 360 in-lb. It had less than 50 cycles on it at time of testing. After a calibration adjustment, all test values were within +/- 1.2% of the target value.
PI split beam wrenches are hugely overrated, IMO. You get a wrench that fails to meet its 4% accuracy specification, you get a pseudo calibration certificate with no test data on it, you get a wrench that was very likely not tested after manufacturing, and you get only a 90 day warranty.
Is eclaitorq who makes the SO one? I suspect SO is also from overseas if it’s digital…https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/threads/electronic-digital-torque-wrench.462191/post-8678805
If eclatorq is still making these for HF, $329 for the 1/2" is a great deal.
I just wished it went up to 300 ft-lbs.
No, Snap-On is in-house.Is eclaitorq who makes the SO one? I suspect SO is also from overseas if it’s digital…
I need to do some bolts that require angle. I’m thinking to just buy a quality mechanical angle gauge. I get
It that a digital wrench is going to be more convenient. But I am not sure the cost differential is worth it outside of a production environment.
For a few bolts? Why not just mark the bolt or socket with the angle and tighten to it. If you just want to justify buying another tool, I can sympathize.I need to do some bolts that require angle. I’m thinking to just buy a quality mechanical angle gauge. I get
It that a digital wrench is going to be more convenient. But I am not sure the cost differential is worth it outside of a production environment.
Yeah I use a protector and paint pen on some pretty pricey stuff.For a few bolts? Why not just mark the bolt or socket with the angle and tighten to it. If you just want to justify buying another tool, I can sympathize.