This is a kind of EV that I could see me owning.
65k base, so 75k for a mid trim. that's 10k (sticker) higher than a mid trim power boost (only comparable model). 10k/$3.00X20mpg = 67k miles before you make up the difference. not great, not terrible. And that's not taking into account the running cost of the ram. which will be cheap but will cost you some electricity and some fuel.
Well alrighty then, almost Rivian money for this.65k base, so 75k for a mid trim. that's 10k (sticker) higher than a mid trim power boost (only comparable model). 10k/$3.00X20mpg = 67k miles before you make up the difference. not great, not terrible. And that's not taking into account the running cost of the ram. which will be cheap but will cost you some electricity and some fuel.
So, it's like the Chevy Volt, but a truck.
The prospect of it only coming in the 5'7" bed is annoying to me. I just said the other day, any future truck will have at least a 6' bed. You can close the tailgate on a lot of things with a 6'4" bed.not a fan of the half ton "car-truck" look or the "car-truck" capability. A half tons limitations become very apparent..
short bed problems, towing problems, payload problems lololololz can't tell you guys how many times ive seen modern half tons sagging and absolutely struggling to pull a 7k lbs "half ton ready" fifth wheel camper in the mountains.
I know. But most people forget that part.With one large exception - the Volt has a physical final drive ratio connection.
I know. But most people forget that part.
That theoretically could long distance tow if needed. Sounds like the best of both worlds. Personally I'd just rather have EV and not deal with a gas powerplant at all, but I've never towed long distance anyway.Well alrighty then, almost Rivian money for this.
The prospect of it only coming in the 5'7" bed is annoying to me. I just said the other day, any future truck will have at least a 6' bed. You can close the tailgate on a lot of things with a 6'4" bed.
Me too. If it sells they may offer it in different configurations and with a bigger bed. I wish them well.This is a kind of EV that I could see me owning.
I expect they will sell each one they buildI like the idea, but that price is going to sink it. So much for "saving the environment" eh? Lets build an electric truck that everyone can find attractive, including guys who tow a lot and/or need tons of payload (those specs alone are impressive and almost 2500 territory) and then price it so high nobody can afford it. Absolutely brilliant.
Possibly torque to turn the generator. If it can produce more power than the vehicle needs to charge while driving it down the road that’s going to be a lot of force to turn the generator under full load. If a lesser powertrain couldn’t do that then you’d have to charge and get fuel to offset the charge on long trips. If I had to do both I’d just take a straight EV or ICE vehicle instead. I’m really not a fan of unnecessary complication in vehicles especially if the payoff of it sucks. This thing has to be stupid heavy considering it’s a full EV with a V6 generator on board. It’ll be far from efficient for either powertrain.They actually did something I have been saying for a while now. Have an engine do nothing but charge the battery. Not sure why they needed a V6 for that. Why not a small 3-4 cylinder?
130KW generator is just a little on the small side for a 250-300HP 3.6L engine. Possibly the engine is an Atkinson cycle or other lower output, more efficient design?
Possibly torque to turn the generator. If it can produce more power than the vehicle needs to charge while driving it down the road that’s going to be a lot of force to turn the generator under full load. If a lesser powertrain couldn’t do that then you’d have to charge and get fuel to offset the charge on long trips. If I had to do both I’d just take a straight EV or ICE vehicle instead. I’m really not a fan of unnecessary complication in vehicles especially if the payoff of it sucks. This thing has to be stupid heavy considering it’s a full EV with a V6 generator on board. It’ll be far from efficient for either powertrain.
It’s not though. 92kwh is a big battery. It may be on the smaller end for an EV truck battery. This thing must weigh twice what my Tesla does and nearly 3 times my VW.It's a full EV but the battery capacity is much less than other EVs, since it doesn't need to get full range on the battery itself. So the battery weight is far less, but yes they still add the pentastar back in.
My take on this is that this system could work very well as long as they offer it in basic trims (which they don't appear to be doing).
The power levels are nice, it probably tows amazing vs my truck since it adds a lot of power and the increased weight with a very low center of gravity adds towing stability. The gas engine completely eliminates range anxiety. Most of my driving would be EV, and then while towing the gas engine would be my source of power. I can throw some jerry cans in the back of my bed for extra piece of mind on those long remote, cross country trips.
In other words this would fit my needs completely. If one is forced into making EVs, this approach makes the most sense for trucks. The pentastar can be tuned to run at maximum efficiency. It's absolutely the perfect way to introduce EVs into trucks until the battery capacity and charging infrastructure catches up which could be decades away yet.
I'm not a fan of EV trucks in the slightest. But this stuff is beyond our control now, we're getting EVs, it's simply a fact though it will take longer than 2035. So if I'm forced into an EV, this would be my truck.
As long as simple big v8's are available, that will be my truck though.