Read the comments. Just some snippets from the comments:
Cool test. What's rarely discussed though is how much dust "actually" needs filtering from engine oil. Many modern OE air filters are 99+% efficient and prevent most wear-causing particles from entering the oil in the first place. Some fuel systems incorporate separate air filters to filter air that enters the fuel tank as fuel is withdrawn (in addition to fuel filters). Therefore given adequate air/fuel filter design, an OE may determine lower oil filter efficiency still provides adequate engine design life. Lots of high mileage Toyota's on the road.
There is much missing from this conversation without actual oil flow rates in the intended applications. Does my 1ZZFE 1.8L I4 flow oil at even 3GPM? Remember, its entire oil capacity is 1G including the filter. When I bought it new in 2003 I used AC/Delco filters. They got hard to find so I switched to standard Purolators. They got stupidly priced so I went back to OEM. I've been using the same on my wife's 2009 2.4L Toyota. Both have well over a quarter million miles and run like new...
...Some decades ago, oil filters were tested in Finland and it was found that Toyota's OEM filters were an order of magnitude better than the others. I don't remember the criteria.It is almost impossible for a layman to distinguish the best imitations from the originals. I will gladly pay even double the price of a Toyota dealer when I can be sure that the product meets Toyota's requirements, whoever the real manufacturer is.
Ill stick with the oem Toyota filter, which is made by Denso. Paying $5 for an oil filter at the dealer is fine by me. Considering the filter is made by a car manufacturer who makes engines that are known to last over 300 and 400K miles.
I think manufacturers must balance filtering performance versus flow. We could put 1 micron filters on engine's, but then the engine's would be oil starved. So there's a balance between allowing enough oil in to protect surfaces versus keeping wear material out of the oil that cause damage. There's a sweet spot somewhere I'm sure.I was happy to see you suggest at the end that an explanation for the "capacity" results isn't that the filter is capturing that many particles but simply that your test is designed in such a way that there is just more stuff in suspension throughout the test rig. The filters with Higher "capacities" aren't holding all the material going into the test. It just takes that much material of the test dust to be introduced that the filters become clogged by a sufficient number of what sized particles are needed to clog them.I don't think the capacity interpretation correctly attributes the observed volume of material to the filter "holding" all the material introduced.I would submit that another interpretation is that lower filtering levels results in more material in circulation overall, even though "clogging" will occur later.
So your saying Toyota has the best flow rate but worst filtering performance. Then why do there engines last so long?
This video shows that Toyota filter has enough filtering properties.We use cheap Toyota filters for 15+ years and repair engines. And definitely main reasons of wearing motors are:- dust from intake system (90+% of cases) - untimely oil addition in cases when engine has oil comsumption- untimely oil change- poor oil quality etc...
I wonder if the Toyota filter was an actual genuine Toyota filter or a counterfeit part