Originally Posted By: AndyinAL
18 months ago I took a job that requires me to drive an average of 350 miles per day using my personal vehicle and my fuel. At the time I did not own a suitable vehicle so I rented cars while I shopped (only $150 per week using Costco discount - not bad considering I was logging almost 2k per week)
They kept giving me Ford Focuses. I had 4 different ones. 3 of the 4 had transmissions that made the strangest sounds I have ever heard coming from an automatic transmission. Hunting for gears, refusal to downshift at very slow speeds then slamming into a gear. It felt and sounded like a dry, mechanical power delivery as opposed to the smooth hydraulic nature of an automatic. Somebody mentioned clutches earlier - it sounded like dry, rattling, banging clutches.
These were all very new cars with less than 12k miles. The one that shifted right was nice to drive and I kept it until they demanded it back for service. The other 3 I cussed and could not imagine how a major auto company could put out something like this in 2013. I suspect a traditional, smooth transmission would probably increase fuel consumption by 1% or something. I would not own one. Everything else about the car seemed nice.
I ended up getting a 2005 Corolla. With 250k on it now it drives and shifts like new.
I can't imagine a Focus having the same resale value 8 years from now as a Toyota. The styling is not the greatest though...
YMMV
Sorry to derail the thread, but I have a question for AndyinAl:
If you don't have any other costs other than fuel, $150 for 2000 miles put you at about 7.5 cents per mile in depreciation/financing/licensing/insurance/repair/maintenance/&c. costs. That is a bargain! I don't see how you could do better than that buying/financing/leasing a new car. To me, with that kind of miles being driven, it makes sense to keep on renting, just keep a beater car for weeks when you don't work. Leave the rental company/other renters holding the bag on repairs/mtce./depreciation/wear & tear/tires/oil.