1996 Dodge Ram 5.9

CCI

Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
406
Location
New Mexico USA
Just bought a 1996 Dodge Ram B3500 with the 5.9 gas engine, +/- 76K miles.

No owner's manual included.

What is the right oil for this engine? I'm guessing 10w-30 but I'm also guessing there are folks here who know.
 
10w-30 would be perfect and also the factory recommend for that vintage.
As would 15w-40. We ran that vintage of 5.9L > 1,000,000 miles pulling heavy trailers. They virtually run forever. The transmissions and differentials, that another story and it's not good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wlk
As would 15w-40. We ran that vintage of 5.9L > 1,000,000 miles pulling heavy trailers. They virtually run forever. The transmissions and differentials, that another story and it's not good.
Holy cow…. My dad selected the 5.2L (318) in his new ‘95 Ram Sport bc he believed it was a better built engine than the 5.9 360. I know that gen 5.9 I-6 Cummins was made to outlast any Mopar gas burner of that era.
 
10w-30 would be perfect and also the factory recommend for that vintage.
Replaced the previously installed STP filter with NAPA Gold filter and used the NAPA store brand 10w-30 oil.

A little surprising how much the oil pressure gauge went up.

Thanks to all who responded.
 
Just bought a 1996 Dodge Ram B3500 with the 5.9 gas engine, +/- 76K miles.

No owner's manual included.

What is the right oil for this engine? I'm guessing 10w-30 but I'm also guessing there are folks here who know.
There's no "perfect" oil for that engine, just lots that will work well.

Personally anything that old I'm using a HM oil with seal conditioners. So I'd be leaning on Valvoline EP HM in 5w30.
 
Holy cow…. My dad selected the 5.2L (318) in his new ‘95 Ram Sport bc he believed it was a better built engine than the 5.9 360. I know that gen 5.9 I-6 Cummins was made to outlast any Mopar gas burner of that era.
They were the same engine for all practical purposes. The the small block LA engine had a couple minor revisions (hydraulic roller cams in 1985, for example) a one major one (the "magnum" rework in 1992 that moved to stud mounted rockers, different intake manifold bolting, oiling through the pushrods, etc).

For all practical purposes, the only real difference between a 318 and and 360 of comparable vintage is that the 360s were commonly external balanced with either special dampers or weighted torque converters (finding the sketchiest way to accomplish something, don't you change, Mopar!). The 318 being a shorter stroke like the 340 (literally only a bore difference in basic geometry), it was easy to internally balance.

The Cummins engine wasn't "made to outlast any mopar" of the era. It was actually made for Case/New Holland. Certainly it would indeed outlast any of the small blocks, but it's not at mopar's request that this occurred. The only credit Chrysler can take for the Cummins engine durability was that they made engines and axles so weak that the engine had to be detuned all the way down to 160hp/400lb-ft to let the driveline of the first gen trucks hold up.

 
They were the same engine for all practical purposes. The the small block LA engine had a couple minor revisions (hydraulic roller cams in 1985, for example) a one major one (the "magnum" rework in 1992 that moved to stud mounted rockers, different intake manifold bolting, oiling through the pushrods, etc).

For all practical purposes, the only real difference between a 318 and and 360 of comparable vintage is that the 360s were commonly external balanced with either special dampers or weighted torque converters (finding the sketchiest way to accomplish something, don't you change, Mopar!). The 318 being a shorter stroke like the 340 (literally only a bore difference in basic geometry), it was easy to internally balance.

The Cummins engine wasn't "made to outlast any mopar" of the era. It was actually made for Case/New Holland. Certainly it would indeed outlast any of the small blocks, but it's not at mopar's request that this occurred. The only credit Chrysler can take for the Cummins engine durability was that they made engines and axles so weak that the engine had to be detuned all the way down to 160hp/400lb-ft to let the driveline of the first gen trucks hold up.


Indeed. My dad never kept vehicles long enough to really experience major issues as he worked for decades at one of their plants and got employee pricing, which "back in the day" before it was offered willy nilly, was actually quite good so he traded every couple of years. Who knows "why" he thought the 318 was stouter than the 360....but he did think that. Man, I sure do miss him and that truck.....lots of good memories driving it like a 16 year old drives their dad's V8 truck on the weekends. Haha.

IMG_8057.webp
 
The 5.2 and 5.9 can last a long time. My parents had a '78 Van three-on-the-tree with a quarter million miles before they sold it in the late 80s.
 
Back
Top Bottom