1982 buick regal wagon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
42,444
Location
ME
Looked at a nice oddball car today.

1983 was the last year for buick regal wagons. Looked at an 82. I really like the styling of the quad headlight GMs from the early 80s. And I like the elcamino esque in-bumper taillights in this particular car.

These year cars came with one's choice of 3.8 or 4.1 gas V6s, or 4.3 or 5.7 diesels. This one had the 4.1, a punched out 3.8. I guess GM marketing wouldn't allow the mighty 150 hp 307 V8 in the midsize wagons.

Full frame. I understand the coupes have a most-frame that disappears at the front of the rear axle. Not this beast. Think it rode on 195/75/14 tires.
lol.gif


70k original miles. Was, as the seller told me, used by a museum to make deliveries only in the summer. Was in some snooty rich guy seaside village type of town. Not too shabby body wise.

I wonder if this heap shared the original 3.8s oddball firing order. Motor shook at idle. Also seemed to idle rather fast. 4 barrell carb. Owner moved to Spain and his brother is trying to dump the car. Is blaming all the cludges on said missing brother.
lol.gif


Oil fill cap demanded 5w30.

3 speed automatic tranny. Found a spec of 3400 lbs for this motor and wagon. Light! (A chevy cruze is 3100.) Supposed 2.73 rear end. 110 hp, 180 ish ft lbs torque. Only drove it two inches. Trying to imagine what kind of dog it must be, and what the gas mileage reward is; IE can it hit 20? Has the computerized carb but without a zillion vacuum hoses.

It's really funny, as this car felt like a full size wagon, even though the B-bodies like the caprice must be bigger. It's way larger than a FWD ciera/century wagon. It's also a rolling memorial to some weird days of downsizing and gas mileage pursuit.

AC was dead. Seller said in his ad his price was firm. I went through my "I don't want to insult you" routine after revealing I was looking for the AC that was advertised and left an offer he didn't accept... but didn't dismiss.
lol.gif


Edit, this thing had four v-belts including a skinny little thing for the smog air pump which miraculously remains connected stuffing air into the middle of the cat. Has a crazy set up where the crank spin the water pump and PS, then the water pump spins the AC, smog pump and fan. Don't wear a tie when you bend over the motor!
lol.gif
 
I had a larger estate wagon with the olds 403 engine. With the towing package it was a pretty quick large car. That belt setup was not uncommon for that era. Those cars if rear ended will suffer little damage especially with the trailer hitch and will tear the dickens out of whatever hits it. Had a prelude hit me busted his radiator, both front fenders were bent, the hood and headlights were hanging out. All i could say to him was "Hey you scratched my chome hitch cover!!"
grin2.gif
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: spasm3
I had a larger estate wagon with the olds 403 engine. With the towing package it was a pretty quick large car. That belt setup was not uncommon for that era. Those cars if rear ended will suffer little damage especially with the trailer hitch and will tear the dickens out of whatever hits it. Had a prelude hit me busted his radiator, both front fenders were bent, the hood and headlights were hanging out. All i could say to him was "Hey you scratched my chome hitch cover!!"
grin2.gif



lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
Great story!

The 403 was a pretty good engine for the time. My mom had a 1979 Ninety-Eight Regency with that same motor and it would scoot!
 
It would make a *great* taxi though if the AC worked. No power (for your drivers to abuse), lots of room, and the low miles are a great starting point. Ultra reliable turbo 350 tranny.

Forgot the last odd feature: Power rear VENT windows! The little triangles in the rear doors! Only one worked, of course. Controls were on the driver's door. The regular rear power windows only had controls on their own doors, though.

Just had flashbacks to my grandpa having an olds version of this, with single large headlamps instead. Like the regal quad headlamp styling much better.
 
These are the 'cars of my youth'....seriously, they were EVERYWHERE when I was growing up....

Dad had a '78 V-8 Malibu....across the street was a LeMans 4-door sedan....end of the street was a blue 2-door Regal coupe...step-father had a 1979 V-6 wagon...close friends of the family had a 1983 Malibu wagon....best friends mom had another LeMans 4-door sedan.....

Suprised there wasn't the option of a V-8 on this wagon, just V-6's....all others had the Chev 305 as an option, IIRC. With a V-8, they were definetly 'peppy', but none of them were fast, by any stretch. My step-dad's '79 got around pretty well with a 3.8 V-6.

Agree with what you say about them being a 'weird size' - not a full-size, but most of the attributes of a full size (frame, style, driving feel). They were definetly pretty 'soft' i the handling department.

Up here, at least, $1200 wouldn't be bad for a clean, low-mileage example. If I was in the market, I would grabbed it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom