Perhaps it was a typo and meant to be "genteel" or even "gentile". No matter which was intended, it could use clarification.What? Gentle?
Perhaps it was a typo and meant to be "genteel" or even "gentile". No matter which was intended, it could use clarification.What? Gentle?
People in the developing world are smarter than us because they have to be.Stupid specification!
How does an average (99.999%) consumer can figure that out? Considering many don't even read the owner's manual.
That’s the first thing that came to mind for me, as well. Translation apps are far from perfect.Maybe a loss of translation. Probably meant something else. I’ve never heard of oil described as gentle.
People in the developing world are smarter than us because they have to be.
Remember our average ancestors drove an ox cart half way across the Great Plains and started farming to survive. We’re all just lab rats now waiting for our next treat.
no, more protective.What? Gentle?
It is interesting to analyze developed or developing countries by giving the calcium content in fat.People in the developing world are smarter than us because they have to be.
Remember our average ancestors drove an ox cart half way across the Great Plains and started farming to survive. We’re all just lab rats now waiting for our next treat.
... this is a forum, but it's turned into a chat room.
A 16-grade is "more protective" than a 20-grade?no, more protective.
You just got here! How would you know what the board has "turned into" already?I asked you a question. But you're diverting the conversation. Yes, this is a forum, but it's turned into a chat room. No one is commenting on the oils. I recommend checking out oil-club.ru.
Are you saying the calcium comes from motor oil?It is interesting to analyze developed or developing countries by giving the calcium content in fat.
Yes, you're right. I realized that this forum site wouldn't yield any results. Thank you for your answers."I can find these oils. However, it's hard to find pao-ester in Türkiye."
You have found different oils that meet the requirements and there were also other good suggestions here including C3, etc.
You are chasing pao-ester ... which has nothing to do with meeting the Mitsubishi requirements. And if you stick around long enough, you'll find out that there is no "best oil" or at least no consensus as far as I know.
I would chase approvals and not the base oil.
Yes, you're right. I realized that this forum site wouldn't yield any results. Thank you for your answers.
I think Mitsubishi was doing that as a hedge against possible LSPI.It really is interesting too see a manufacturer specifying the concentration of an individual element seems a bizarre, but looks like thats what Mitsubishi did.
I recently noticed something similar while browsing the manual for the (Kohler) Mitsubishi S16R.That's interesting that the owner's manual gives specific elemental analysis and TBN requirements. Does it give any kind of ACEA Sequence?
I love it how my Toyota mentions nothing but viscosity. Synthetic? Conventional? Kernel oil? It does not matter so long it flowsI recently noticed something similar while browsing the manual for the (Kohler) Mitsubishi S16R.
View attachment 293909
Agreed. In general i like redline fluids, but that high Ca is what keeps me away. Would not meet oem specs hereI think Mitsubishi was doing that as a hedge against possible LSPI.