Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Sounds like someone doesn't get out much. Driven an ATS? Examined the interior?
They may not be perfection but they are entirely comparable to any BMW IMO. How about an ATS-V sport?
This is a CTS V sport model, the ATS is even better: "And the Vsport impressed right out of the box, sticking to the skidpad at 0.95 g and stopping from 70 mph in just 155 feet—bona fide supersedan numbers. The last BMW M5 we tested couldn’t match either of those figures, and while the lighter M3 manages higher cornering grip, it beats the Vsport’s stopping distance by only two feet. And with two Mitsubishi turbos squeezing 15 psi into the intake, the overachieving 3.6 pushed the CTS to 60 mph in 4.6 seconds, through the quarter-mile in 13.1 at 110 mph, and up to a 171-mph terminal velocity."
And lighter than a comparable BMW as well.
Caddy Engine Twerkin lol
Sounds like someone doesn't get out much. Driven an ATS? Examined the interior?
They may not be perfection but they are entirely comparable to any BMW IMO. How about an ATS-V sport?
This is a CTS V sport model, the ATS is even better: "And the Vsport impressed right out of the box, sticking to the skidpad at 0.95 g and stopping from 70 mph in just 155 feet—bona fide supersedan numbers. The last BMW M5 we tested couldn’t match either of those figures, and while the lighter M3 manages higher cornering grip, it beats the Vsport’s stopping distance by only two feet. And with two Mitsubishi turbos squeezing 15 psi into the intake, the overachieving 3.6 pushed the CTS to 60 mph in 4.6 seconds, through the quarter-mile in 13.1 at 110 mph, and up to a 171-mph terminal velocity."
And lighter than a comparable BMW as well.
Caddy Engine Twerkin lol