I did, but I wouldn't in a lab. I used to get headaches after 10 minutes wearing safety glasses.
TBN Zero
- Thread starter bigunz
- Start date
- Status
dnewton3
Staff member
Originally Posted By: danielLD
95% lab error.
Even the best labs in the world make human errors all the time. An example I frequently run into, the lab girl mixed up the sample she grabbed. not hard to do when you've been on your feet for 8 hours a day with safety glasses, fumes and that prison lighting. No human or social interaction, just numbers day in day out.
I have BN's retested every now and then if I suspect an error.
Lab numbers almost all labs use, ex.
2026879
2026878
2026877
2026876
2026875
2026674
2026873
2026872
2026871
2026870
2026869
2026868
Anyone catch the mistake?
Yup - "6"74
95% lab error.
Even the best labs in the world make human errors all the time. An example I frequently run into, the lab girl mixed up the sample she grabbed. not hard to do when you've been on your feet for 8 hours a day with safety glasses, fumes and that prison lighting. No human or social interaction, just numbers day in day out.
I have BN's retested every now and then if I suspect an error.
Lab numbers almost all labs use, ex.
2026879
2026878
2026877
2026876
2026875
2026674
2026873
2026872
2026871
2026870
2026869
2026868
Anyone catch the mistake?
Yup - "6"74
4WD
$50 site donor 2024
Might be Phillips oil
MolaKule
Staff member
Originally Posted By: kschachn
...That is highly unlikely, each lot from a production run would have been quality tested and its impossible for any one bottle from that lot to be deficient. It's much more likely that the lab that performed the analysis has for some reason reported the wrong number, especially since he's already stated that another lab reported a different and much more reasonable number.
It would be helpful if the OP would post an image of the actual lab report so everything could be seen in context.
...That is highly unlikely, each lot from a production run would have been quality tested and its impossible for any one bottle from that lot to be deficient. It's much more likely that the lab that performed the analysis has for some reason reported the wrong number, especially since he's already stated that another lab reported a different and much more reasonable number.
It would be helpful if the OP would post an image of the actual lab report so everything could be seen in context.
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
