These 3 SUV have little in common but am considering all 3.
Circa 2008-2009 years
I am most familiar with the Outback, have had a number of them. Specifically looking for a H6 as I don't trust the 2.5L in these years.
OTOH, the Tahoe seems like a better deal. For about the same price, you get a V8, more space, cheaper parts.
The Highlander is neat. maybe the highest quality of all 3, not sure. Any known issues with the Toyota SUV? How easy to fix? Transmission issues? I am concerned the 3.6L V6 sidewinder engine might be difficult to work on, like spark plugs or the belts. The Tahoe is a "normal" engine facing forward with the water pump and the belts easier to get to.
I would throw in Volve XC70 Crossover wagon in the mix but it seems to have an unusually high number of mechanical problems - scanning the volvo forums, timing belt can jump a tooth, transmission problems constantly advertised, etc.
OTOH with the Tahoe, it should handle the worst with the weight and bulk. Doubtful it will even get to 20mpg even with 5.3L.
Circa 2008-2009 years
I am most familiar with the Outback, have had a number of them. Specifically looking for a H6 as I don't trust the 2.5L in these years.
OTOH, the Tahoe seems like a better deal. For about the same price, you get a V8, more space, cheaper parts.
The Highlander is neat. maybe the highest quality of all 3, not sure. Any known issues with the Toyota SUV? How easy to fix? Transmission issues? I am concerned the 3.6L V6 sidewinder engine might be difficult to work on, like spark plugs or the belts. The Tahoe is a "normal" engine facing forward with the water pump and the belts easier to get to.
I would throw in Volve XC70 Crossover wagon in the mix but it seems to have an unusually high number of mechanical problems - scanning the volvo forums, timing belt can jump a tooth, transmission problems constantly advertised, etc.
OTOH with the Tahoe, it should handle the worst with the weight and bulk. Doubtful it will even get to 20mpg even with 5.3L.