I'd like to say that no engine needs exhaust backpressure. "Backpressure" is a misnomer of the concept of fluid velocity. Narrower exhaust ports and smaller diameter primary header runs increase velocity which increases inertia, which when combined with camshaft overlap, can increase the scavenging effect at the exhaust port, which in turn further clears the cylinder of exhaust gasses and draws intake charge in, all during the overlap event. On some older naturally aspirated engines with more overlap (10+ degrees), the small port and tubes allowed the scavenging effect to be greatest at low and mid RPMs, but choked torque/HP in the high RPM range.
Backpressure for backpressure's sake is always bad, always. Smaller ports and primaries only still exist today on newer engines for emissions purposes in that the faster exhaust gas can leave the port, the less time it has to cool down and the hotter it arrives at the catalyst. The only benefit to small ports on a turbo engine are about the same as the emissions case, but also means hotter faster exhaust gasses at the turbine for quick spool.
That said, 2.5" is about right if you want to support the most peak HP without oversizing. 2.25" is ideal if you don't always use the top end of your RPM range (I suspect this is you). Of course system design is very important in enabling inertial flow through the exhaust, like 'straight through' muffling devices, rather than baffled, S and U shaped turns.