well, if you don't believe it, lets see a peer reviewed paper in SAE proving it wrong....
however, if you read the whole thing you see a couple of items.
1) while the test was for 5 years, it's to show the oil will work fine, not longevity of the engine. however, the engine longevity was not compromised during the test. moreover, these cars were on a short cycle test to prove that synthetics can handle this sort of driving better than regular oils. nothing says that if at 60 months, if you took this car on a 90MPH drive cross country, you might not even make it out of the state.
2)the major point which most miss, is that while the oil wasn't changed, it was made up from the testing pulls. in fact, over the course of the 5 years, 4.4L of new oil was put in the car, and the car was a qt low at the finish, making the oil add effect even more pronounced. many tests show that even a small amount of make up oil has a great effect on the aggregate oil characteristics. these tests basically put a whole new oilchange in the car.
3) nowhere (that i found) did they say how many miles were put on the car. if you figure the cycle was done twice a day on weekdays only (9miles/day x 5 days/week x 52weeks/year x5years/test) gets you under 12k miles for the entire test. 12k miles for a synthetic is well within the usage parameters.
would i run 5 years on an oil? no way. do i believe the test? absolutely, but i also read the fine print (and put it in my post) that shows that the test isn't as great (or as bad) as it seems at first blush. my point is that for OCI's of 1 year or 10-15k miles (whichever comes first) the trip profile is immaterial. run the whole 15k at 90mph at one setting or do it 1 mile per trip, a good synthetic just doesn't care.