Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
One thing I find very interesting is that at least in the mass media (although not sure it if has actually been brought up in the court room) was the question of why Martin didn't simply call 911 himself when he saw Zimmerman following instead of engaging him in a physical confrontation which we know is a fact, even if the details are not clear. Martin had equal responsibility to avoid a confrontation as much as Zimmerman did but I sure haven't heard this mentioned.
I think in general, black people are generally distrustful of both the police and calling 911. I'm not surprised he didn't call. And legally, no--Martin didn't actually have the same legal responsibility to retreat if he didn't initiate the confrontation. That's the way the law reads. If Zimmerman initiated the confrontation (which he clearly did by following TM), it was actually HIS legal responsibility to retreat to avoid the confrontation. Actually, if TM had a gun and he felt he was in eminent danger of grave bodily harm, e.g. he saw GZ's gun, he could have shot him, legally.
Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
I also believe that the Judge, when she queried Zimmerman about whether or not he would take the stand in his defense was IMPROPER protocol. That was a question for his counsel to handle. Frankly this Judge wants to make Zimmerman look bad, it has been apparent the entire time. She is very biased.
Agree, totally. If he's found guilty I think is grounds for appeal on a silver platter.
Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
Also I didn't know that the city fired the police chief and the head detective because NEITHER of them wanted to press charges against Zimmerman. The reason why they didn't was because they understand that under the "stand your ground" LAW a person has the right to use DEADLY FORCE when he is in fear for his life, when Martin was pounding away on Zimmerman the only thing the defendant was thinking was, "I think this crazy punk is going to kill me with his bare hands."
IMO, they SHOULD have been fired, and frankly bear a lot of responsibility for the whole mess. The did an inadequate job of investigating. Keep in mind, I don't think charges should have been brought. It seems they were brought for political reason after these guys dropped the ball. They didn't check his phone records, didn't interview the person he was talking to when he was shot? Sorry, that gives the appearance of not caring a lot when a kid is shot dead. I think they reached the right conclusion, but didn't do their due diligence in getting there...and they're largely responsible for the whole mess.